Bug 1425860
Summary: | [HCI] [Beta-1] Documented deployment wizard prompts were not encountered during setup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | khartsoe <khartsoe> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Laura Bailey <lbailey> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | RamaKasturi <knarra> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | joherr, knarra, rhs-bugs, sabose, sankarshan, sasundar, storage-doc, storage-qa-internal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-08-29 04:11:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1277939 |
Description
khartsoe@redhat.com
2017-02-22 15:44:21 UTC
I checked the table and everything looks fine for me. When installing hosted-engine on a RHVH setup, if appliance is not found in the system it asks a question , appliance is not installed on the system. Do you want to install it now? @sas, Should we be adding this to the table? what do you think? (In reply to RamaKasturi from comment #10) > I checked the table and everything looks fine for me. When installing > hosted-engine on a RHVH setup, if appliance is not found in the system it > asks a question , appliance is not installed on the system. Do you want to > install it now? > > @sas, Should we be adding this to the table? what do you think? Not required, we just document the possible values for configuration of hosted-engine VM. One can't proceed with the setup without saying 'Yes'. The status clearly explains that there is no appliance installed. Hi Laura, We need to update the RAM. We can't go with default in this case. I remember there was OOM kill with 4GB RAM ( default value ) and in that mail thread, it was mentioned that with 8GB RAM all worked well. So I feel minimum RAM should be 8GB and recommended is 16GB. @Sahina - could you clarify ? What can be added to the docs ? We need to highlight that, so the user doesn't miss that (In reply to SATHEESARAN from comment #13) > Hi Laura, > > We need to update the RAM. We can't go with default in this case. > > I remember there was OOM kill with 4GB RAM ( default value ) and in that > mail thread, it was mentioned that with 8GB RAM all worked well. So I feel > minimum RAM should be 8GB and recommended is 16GB. > > @Sahina - could you clarify ? What can be added to the docs ? > > We need to highlight that, so the user doesn't miss that Kasturi has updated with her testing that the latest appliance (rhvm-appliance-4.1-20170403.0 ) has the configuration that sets the Engine RAM size to 16GB. So nothing needs to be edited. Moving this bug back to ON_QA Question and answers provided in the table looks good to me. Moving this to verified state. Fixed in RHGS 3.3 documentation. |