Bug 1426651

Summary: gfs2-utils: enabling support for the HA and RS variants on the ppc64le
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Djordje Todorovic <dtodorov>
Component: gfs2-utilsAssignee: Andrew Price <anprice>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Chris Mackowski <cmackows>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Priority: high    
Version: 7.4CC: anprice, cfeist, cluster-maint, cluster-qe, cmackows, djansa, gfs2-maint, hannsj_uhl, mthacker, slevine, swhiteho
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 7.4   
Hardware: ppc64le   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gfs2-utils-3.1.9-4.el7 Doc Type: Release Note
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 21:57:28 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: Red Hat1370652, Engineering1385727, Partner1402364, 1435621    

Description Djordje Todorovic 2017-02-24 14:32:36 UTC
Description of problem:

We are currently working on enabling support for HA and RS variants on the ppc64le platform (due to feature parity with x86_64) for the RHEL-7.4. gfs2-utils is currently marked as mandatory for the x86_64 in the compose config but has not yet been built on the ppc64le and will thus, break the composes, until built.

Comment 1 Andrew Price 2017-03-03 17:18:52 UTC
The upstream gfs2-utils test suite passes on ppc64le and I see no reason not to get this done asap to enable further testing. As it just requires a .spec change, all this needs is for the remaining flags (qa_ack, pm_ack) to be set.

Comment 2 Steve Whitehouse 2017-03-10 12:07:06 UTC
Can we have a QA ack for this?

Comment 3 Steve Whitehouse 2017-03-10 12:08:02 UTC
Also looking for a PM ack too

Comment 5 Djordje Todorovic 2017-03-15 12:18:41 UTC
gfs2-utils has been made available on the ppc64le in comps

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 21:57:28 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2226