Bug 1426651 - gfs2-utils: enabling support for the HA and RS variants on the ppc64le
Summary: gfs2-utils: enabling support for the HA and RS variants on the ppc64le
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gfs2-utils
Version: 7.4
Hardware: ppc64le
OS: Linux
high
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 7.4
Assignee: Andrew Price
QA Contact: Chris Mackowski
Steven J. Levine
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1370652 1385727 1402364 1435621
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-24 14:32 UTC by Djordje Todorovic
Modified: 2017-08-01 21:57 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gfs2-utils-3.1.9-4.el7
Doc Type: Release Note
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-08-01 21:57:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2017:2226 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE gfs2-utils bug fix and enhancement update 2017-08-01 18:43:08 UTC

Description Djordje Todorovic 2017-02-24 14:32:36 UTC 
Description of problem:

We are currently working on enabling support for HA and RS variants on the ppc64le platform (due to feature parity with x86_64) for the RHEL-7.4. gfs2-utils is currently marked as mandatory for the x86_64 in the compose config but has not yet been built on the ppc64le and will thus, break the composes, until built.
Comment 1 Andrew Price 2017-03-03 17:18:52 UTC 
The upstream gfs2-utils test suite passes on ppc64le and I see no reason not to get this done asap to enable further testing. As it just requires a .spec change, all this needs is for the remaining flags (qa_ack, pm_ack) to be set.
Comment 2 Steve Whitehouse 2017-03-10 12:07:06 UTC 
Can we have a QA ack for this?
Comment 3 Steve Whitehouse 2017-03-10 12:08:02 UTC 
Also looking for a PM ack too
Comment 5 Djordje Todorovic 2017-03-15 12:18:41 UTC 
gfs2-utils has been made available on the ppc64le in comps
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2017-08-01 21:57:28 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:2226
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.