Bug 1428553

Summary: Custom RBAC role permissions not displaying correctly
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Jeffrey Cutter <jcutter>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Eric Hayes <ehayes>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Satyajit Bulage <sbulage>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.7.0CC: hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo, sbulage
Target Milestone: GA   
Target Release: cfme-future   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: rbac
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-03-09 17:35:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: Bug
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Image showing how checks are not bubbling to the top. none

Description Jeffrey Cutter 2017-03-02 19:44:21 UTC
Created attachment 1259314 [details]
Image showing how checks are not bubbling to the top.

Description of problem:

After creation of custom RBAC role in CloudForms Access Control, the permissions do not display correctly / do not bubble up to the top that they are set below.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

5.7.1.3

How reproducible:

Create a custom role with very limited access.  Save it.  Go back to view the permissions granted to the role and note that they are not bubbling up to the top, see attached pic.

Actual results:

Specific permissions granted are checked, but partial checks to the top are not displayed.

Expected results:

Specific permissions granted are checked and partial checks indicate some below are checked.

Additional info:

Have replicated this in two independent environments on this version of CFME.

Comment 2 Jeffrey Cutter 2017-03-02 20:05:40 UTC
Created attachment 1259318 [details]
Image showing how checks are not bubbling to the top.

Comment 5 Harpreet Kataria 2017-03-09 17:35:09 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1411831 ***