Bug 14290
Summary: | X eats up cpu | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | doug |
Component: | XFree86 | Assignee: | Preston Brown <pbrown> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2000-08-19 16:09:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
doug
2000-07-19 17:50:35 UTC
Does this persist with the latest X packages? I will check and post results. However, I upgraded my enlightenment to latest cvs. I still have problem, but it doesn't occur as frequently. Please note that 'top' reports that 'X' is eating up cpu. Of course, enlightenment works closely with X. I am unable to upgrade to XFree86-4.0.1-0.43.i386.rpm because I only have rpm-3.0.5-0.5 installed on my system. I can't figure out how to upgrade to rpm-4x without installing the beta RH7.0. The -30 package was compiled by a compiler with a bug that could cause strange X server behavior, that's why I'm mentioning this. You should be able to use the latest 3.0.5 RPM at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/updates/6.2/i386 to install later X packages. OK, I'm running XFree86-4.0.1-0.43 now. I'll post in another day to report if I see the same behaviour or not. I cam in this morning and found X running at 47% CPU. I leave X running for several days. This particular session has been up since Aug 17 (when I installed the -0.43 packages). I just glanced over at top and found that X was only at 15%. I had an Eterm running top covering an XEmacs window. I thought, "maybe XEmacs is what is causing the problem." So, I exposed XEmacs and moved the window around with the titlebar. Of course, X cpu usage went up while I was dragging the window around. I actually got it as high as 80%. Now I've been waiting for about five minutes and X has been steady around 50%. I'm not sure what this points to; maybe the window manager (Enlightenment cvs)? I will post to the enlightenment-devel mailing list and see what they think. It does sound like an enlightenment problem; I haven't heard any reports of this here with our enlightenment packages, or with other window managers. |