Bug 1433626

Summary: Review Request: python-defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---Flags: zbyszek: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-10 16:01:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1433623    
Bug Blocks: 1433744, 1433757    

Description Athos Ribeiro 2017-03-18 22:39:20 UTC
Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-defcon.spec
SRPM URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-defcon-0.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm

Description:
Defcon is a set of UFO based objects optimized for use in font editing
applications.
Defcon implements UFO3 as described by the UFO font format. If needed, the
ufo2-deprecated branch has the older, UFO2, version of Defcon.

Fedora Account System Username: athoscr

Comment 1 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-03-19 13:09:05 UTC
You don't need %global sum, you can just put the text in the first Summary, and use %summary in subsequent ones.

"Defcon implements UFO3 as described by the UFO font format. If needed, the
ufo2-deprecated branch has the older, UFO2, version of Defcon." — is this comment applicable to the Fedora package in any way?

I think UFO should be expanded, since not everybody knows which UFO you're talking about ("...set of UFO (Universal Font Format) objects...").

Comment 2 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2017-03-19 13:37:22 UTC
fedora-review reports no issues.

+ package name is OK
+ license is acceptable (MIT)
+ license is specified correctly
+ latest version
+ modern python packaging template is used
+ %python_provide are present
+ no scriptlets necessary
+ %check is present and passes
+ BR/R/P appear correct

Package is APPROVED. (ufoLib dep might need changing to lowercase. Also see notes in previous comment.)

Comment 3 Athos Ribeiro 2017-03-19 13:52:45 UTC
Thanks for the review!

Fixed the summary and the description

Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-defcon.spec

SRPM URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-defcon-0.2.5-2.fc25.src.rpm

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2017-03-20 13:10:35 UTC
Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-defcon

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2017-04-05 13:58:12 UTC
python-defcon-0.3.2-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cdf3a8ca0d

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2017-04-06 22:21:41 UTC
python-defcon-0.3.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cdf3a8ca0d

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-04-10 16:01:28 UTC
python-defcon-0.3.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.