Bug 143464
| Summary: | ghex-devel requires %{epoch} for ghex | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Seth Vidal <skvidal> |
| Component: | ghex | Assignee: | Marius L. Jøhndal <mariuslj> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3 | CC: | bugs.michael |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2004-12-21 13:26:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Fixed in CVS. I'm to blame. In packages I had testbuilt and prepared in CVS, I didn't want to touch epochs because I wanted to leave that decision to the packager owners. ghex is one package where I picked up Matthias' euphoria for deleting epochs, and promptly ran into the trap. Seth, could you ran a "rpm -qpR * | grep epoch" or something like that in full pre-extras tree? Hopefully there are no other cases found. Michael, I ran it last night after I saw ghex-devel. There are no others. Thanks. I'll build this and close. |
Description of problem: Epoch:0 was removed from ghex spec file. ghex was rebuilt. ghex-devel requires %{epoch} in the spec file - but since epoch wasn't there it requires LITERALLY %{epoch}, which always fails on lookup. Needs to be fixed with 0 in place of %{epoch}