Bug 1436800

Summary: python-jsonschema: python3-jsonschema is missing Python 3 version of executables
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Iryna Shcherbina <ishcherb>
Component: python-jsonschemaAssignee: Alan Pevec <apevec>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: apevec, apevec, jberan, upstream-release-monitoring
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-jsonschema-2.6.0-1.fc27 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-07-23 22:49:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1432186    
Attachments:
Description Flags
New version including Python 3 executable fix
none
Patch to avoid unpacked parts none

Description Iryna Shcherbina 2017-03-28 17:32:05 UTC
The Python 3 subpackage python3-jsonschema is missing executables available in the Python 2 subpackage.

According to the Fedora Packaging guidelines for Python [0], if a Python package that supports Python 3 installs executables into /usr/bin,  then either both Python versions of the executables should be packaged, or only the Python 3 version, depending on the functionality they provide.
(Note the "should": having Python 2-only executables is permitted, but strongly discouraged.)

Is it intentional for this particular package?

In case it is not intentional, please provide a Python 3 version of executable, or you can just switch to Python 3 if the functionality is the same regardless of the Python version. The guide for porting Python-based RPMs is available here [1] and you may refer to it for more instructions.

It's ok to do this in Rawhide only, however, it would be greatly
appreciated if you could push it to Fedora 26 as well.

If anything is unclear, or if you need any kind of assistance, you can
ask on IRC (#fedora-python on Freenode), or reply here. We'll be happy
to help investigating or fixing the issue!

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Avoiding_collisions_between_the_python_2_and_python_3_stacks
[1] http://python-rpm-porting.readthedocs.io/

Comment 1 Jan Beran 2017-07-21 11:57:03 UTC
Created attachment 1302317 [details]
New version including Python 3 executable fix

Comment 2 Jan Beran 2017-07-21 11:59:24 UTC
Created attachment 1302318 [details]
Patch to avoid unpacked parts

Comment 3 Jan Beran 2017-07-21 12:05:59 UTC
Hi Alan,

may I ask you to review the updated spec file, and if it is correct, to make a new Fedora build? Thank you.

Comment 4 Alan Pevec 2017-07-21 22:21:13 UTC
*** Bug 1419376 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Alan Pevec 2017-07-23 22:49:26 UTC
Thanks Jan!