Bug 143696
| Summary: | irssi does not load perl scripts | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christopher Stone <tkmame> |
| Component: | irssi | Assignee: | Dams <anvil> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-01-30 10:30:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Christopher Stone
2004-12-24 12:17:27 UTC
Doesn't look like a bug. You need to '/load perl' when Perl support is an optional module and not built in by default. Dag's version has Perl built in instead of a module. Fair enough, but might I suggest building irssi with the perl module built in, as 99.99% of users are going to be using scripts with irssi anyway, having it as a module doesn't make much sense. Users, who use perl scripts in irssi, do use the $HOME/.irssi/startup file, don't they? They would put /load perl in there. With perl support being a module, /unload perl would still work and increase flexibility. I'm not the package maintainer, but I don't think hardcoding perl should be a goal. With perl built in, the sequence /unload perl /load perl gives confusing errors, btw. I agree with Michael, and i dont see why we should/must hard-link perl inside irssi, and i prefer modular things. It's a matter of taste, i guess. |