Bug 1437568
Summary: | Egress routing doesn't work Vmware platform if promiscuous mode setting is not enabled in dvswitch | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Nicolas Nosenzo <nnosenzo> |
Component: | RFE | Assignee: | Ben Bennett <bbennett> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Xiaoli Tian <xtian> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.4.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, cbucur, danw, erich, jokerman, mbarrett, mcurry, mmccomas, snalawad |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | 4.3.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-04-18 21:22:16 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nicolas Nosenzo
2017-03-30 14:44:01 UTC
Some concerns within the original case, Can we expect an IPVLAN solution for egress routing in Openshift? If not, is there any other way of doing this without using MacVLAN or IPVLAN? (In reply to Nicolas Nosenzo from comment #2) > Some concerns within the original case, > > Can we expect an IPVLAN solution for egress routing in Openshift? If not, is > there any other way of doing this without using MacVLAN or IPVLAN? There is currently no way to do this without using MacVLAN, and no plan to implement any other way. It would be possible to implement a solution using either ipvlan or a second NIC. So, moving this from "Networking" to "RFE". This bug has been identified as a dated (created more than 3 months ago) bug. This bug has been triaged (has a trello card linked to it), or reviewed by Engineering/PM and has been put into the product backlog, however this bug has not been slated for a currently planned release (3.9, 3.10 or 3.11), which cover our releases for the rest of the calendar year. As a result of this bugs age, state on the current roadmap and PM Score (being below 70), this bug is being Closed - Differed, as it is currently not part of the products immediate priorities. Please see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zdqF4rB3ea8GmVIZ7qWCVYUaQ7-EexUrQEF0MTwdDkw/edit for more details. *** Bug 1570092 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |