Bug 1438959

Summary: Import Ceph Luminous
Product: [Community] RDO Reporter: John Fulton <johfulto>
Component: rdopkgAssignee: Alan Pevec <apevec>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: trunkCC: gfidente, jefbrown, johfulto, kdreyer
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: trunk   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-04-04 21:47:49 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description John Fulton 2017-04-04 21:26:57 UTC
We need to import the Ceph Luminous version into Storage SIG repos and create a new centos-release-ceph-luminous package

Additional Information	SRPMS from ceph.com are at https://download.ceph.com/rpm-luminous/el7/SRPMS/

Though this is something for CentOS with the following tracker: 

 https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13086

It also affects RDO's packaging of Ceph. It is also a dependency of getting the following Pike blueprint implemented because it assumes that the undercloud has a ceph-ansible RPM. 

 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-ceph-ansible

Comment 1 Alan Pevec 2017-04-04 21:47:49 UTC
This has nothing to do with rdopkg, which is a packaging tool.
Linked http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13086 is the right place but also please do participate in the Storage SIG !

Comment 2 Alan Pevec 2017-04-04 21:49:43 UTC
> It also affects RDO's packaging of Ceph.

There isn't "RDO's packaging of Ceph" - RDO depends on Storage SIG Ceph repos.

Comment 3 John Fulton 2017-04-06 12:51:50 UTC
Thank you Alan for explaining. I see there's a needinfo to me. Anything else you need from me here? As the bug is closed and the issue progressing in the issue below, I will assume not but I just wanted to tie up this lose end. 

https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=13086