Bug 1439518

Summary:	[CodeChange] add intermediate sub package ovirt-engine-core
Product:	[oVirt] ovirt-engine	Reporter:	Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo>
Component:	Packaging.rpm	Assignee:	Nobody <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Pavel Stehlik <pstehlik>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	future	CC:	bugs, didi, fdeutsch, mperina, ybronhei, ylavi, yturgema
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	CodeChange
Target Release:	---	Flags:	rule-engine: ovirt-4.2+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-08-23 13:45:44 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Integration	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1446089

Description Sandro Bonazzola 2017-04-06 07:20:21 UTC

ovirt-engine package is now pulling in postgresql, dwh, websocket-proxy and other tools.

Most of those services can run within separate systems / containers.
We should introduce ovirt-engine-minimal subpackage with the bare minimum to run ovirt-engine and keep ovirt-engine as full blown setup rpm.

This will allow to have unchanged behaviour when installing ovirt-engine and to use ovirt-engine-minimal for containerizing / podifing the engine.

Comment 1 Yedidyah Bar David 2017-04-06 07:56:07 UTC

Do we have plans to split userportal/backend to their own containers at some point? How does this bug align with these plans?

Comment 2 Yedidyah Bar David 2017-04-06 07:57:59 UTC

See also the discussion in bug 1084489.

Comment 3 Martin Perina 2017-04-06 08:33:10 UTC

We should get rid of PostgreSQL RPM dependency when we move to SCL version of PG9.5/9.6, which is planned fo 4.2

Comment 4 Juan Hernández 2017-08-23 09:53:31 UTC

The ovirt-containers project is now frozen. Simplifying that was my reason to work on this bug. If there other reasons to continue working on this, then please re-assign the bug. If not, then consider closing it.

Comment 5 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-08-23 13:45:44 UTC

I'm fine with closing this.