Bug 1447628
| Summary: | [RGW]: "error in read_id for object name: default : (2) No such file or directory" message seen when rgw commands are run | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Tejas <tchandra> |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Casey Bodley <cbodley> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2.3 | CC: | cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, edonnell, hnallurv, kbader, mbenjamin, owasserm, razvan, sweil, tserlin, vakulkar |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 2.3 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-10.2.7-16.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_10.2.7-18redhat1 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-06-19 13:32:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
I forgot to mention that this error message was seen on a multisite setup. Also it does not affect the command ouput. Thanks, Tejas The tracker issue and upstream fix being referred to here was just to provide a 'more descriptive error message' for this - all it did was change what the error message says. That change is indeed present in the downstream build being tested here. But the original reported issue is that the error message is shown in the first place. Removing that error message (by reporting it at a higher log level) would be an additional code change that has not been made upstream. I'll propose such a change. Verified in ceph version:
ceph version 10.2.7-16.el7cp
>radosgw-admin bucket list --cluster master
[]
(In reply to Casey Bodley from comment #9) > The tracker issue and upstream fix being referred to here was just to > provide a 'more descriptive error message' for this - all it did was change > what the error message says. That change is indeed present in the downstream > build being tested here. > > But the original reported issue is that the error message is shown in the > first place. Removing that error message (by reporting it at a higher log > level) would be an additional code change that has not been made upstream. > I'll propose such a change. I think https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9686 is fixing the issue on the master. Maybe backporting that PR is all that needs to be done here. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017:1497 |
Description of problem: This error message is seen when most of the radosgw-admin commands are run. magna077 ~]# radosgw-admin bucket list --cluster slave1 2017-05-03 09:32:10.580572 7f01a73dd9c0 0 error in read_id for object name: default : (2) No such file or directory <---------- [ "lop", "bad", "new1", "bigbucket4", "bigbucket3" ] Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ceph version 10.2.7-13.el7cp (4955aa6a90abc27bc043729db19df24e1c840eac) How reproducible: Always Additional info: This seems to be resolved upstream: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15776 If that is the case, we just need tp pull downstream.