Bug 1448907
| Summary: | [abrt] [faf] NetworkManager: g_logv(): /usr/sbin/NetworkManager killed by 5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani> | ||||
| Component: | NetworkManager | Assignee: | Beniamino Galvani <bgalvani> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 7.4 | CC: | atragler, bgalvani, fgiudici, lmiksik, lrintel, rkhan, sukulkar, thaller, vbenes | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| URL: | http://faf.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com/faf/reports/bthash/c705f2500fd8b4480c2cbedecf067ddd25439c5a/ | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-01 09:28:57 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Beniamino Galvani
2017-05-08 15:31:07 UTC
Created attachment 1277234 [details]
[PATCH] device: release removed devices from master on cleanup
Reproducer: #!/bin/sh ip l add veth0 type veth peer name veth1 ip l set veth0 up ip l set veth1 up nmcli connection add type bridge ifname br1 con-name bridge-br1 ip4 9.9.9.9/32 nmcli connection add type ethernet ifname veth0 con-name bridge-slave-veth0 master bridge-br1 nmcli connection up bridge-br1 nmcli connection up bridge-slave-veth0 sleep 1 ip l del veth0 Maybe this is the same bug as 1445394, what do you think Beniamino? Patch lgtm. (In reply to Thomas Haller from comment #4) > Maybe this is the same bug as 1445394, what do you think Beniamino? I think it's different, the fix from bug 1445394 doesn't solve the failed assertion hit with the reproducer in comment 3. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2299 |