Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Comment 3Beniamino Galvani
2017-05-09 07:21:47 UTC
Reproducer:
#!/bin/sh
ip l add veth0 type veth peer name veth1
ip l set veth0 up
ip l set veth1 up
nmcli connection add type bridge ifname br1 con-name bridge-br1 ip4 9.9.9.9/32
nmcli connection add type ethernet ifname veth0 con-name bridge-slave-veth0 master bridge-br1
nmcli connection up bridge-br1
nmcli connection up bridge-slave-veth0
sleep 1
ip l del veth0
Maybe this is the same bug as 1445394, what do you think Beniamino?
Patch lgtm.
Comment 5Beniamino Galvani
2017-05-22 08:32:14 UTC
(In reply to Thomas Haller from comment #4)
> Maybe this is the same bug as 1445394, what do you think Beniamino?
I think it's different, the fix from bug 1445394 doesn't solve the failed assertion hit with the reproducer in comment 3.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:2299