Bug 1451161
| Summary: | REQUEST tor 3.x available and is stable version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul DeStefano <prd-fedora> |
| Component: | tor | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 25 | CC: | iliana, lewk, mh+fedora, pwouters, s |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-19 20:17:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Paul DeStefano
2017-05-16 01:32:12 UTC
My node probability has dropped to nill. I'm concerned it is because the version of tor is old. Do you think that is possible? There is no Tor 3.x release, but I assume you mean Tor 0.3.x? Well the current version is only one release (0.2.9.10 - 0.2.9.11) behind the last LTS release: "If you need a release with long-term support, 0.2.9 is what we recommend: we plan to support it until at least 1 Jan 2020." https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tor-0308-released-fix-hidden-services-also-are-02429-02514-02612-0278-02814-and-02911 So your probability should not really be affected by that. Regarding 0.3.0.8 see #1284469 I would suggest to close this issue in favor of #1284469 Yes, that sounds great. Thank you for explaining. I confess I loose track of the Tor release scheme often. LTS sounds fine. Although, I hope we don't need to wait for 2020 for a new version. Sorry for the late reply, BTW. I would have closed this bug, but wasn't sure what type of close you intended. I guess only Jamie can close the bug *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1284469 *** |