Bug 1458811

Summary: Archived container entities are not destroyed when the provider is deleted
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Satoe Imaishi <simaishi>
Component: ProvidersAssignee: Ari Zellner <azellner>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Gilad Shefer <gshefer>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.8.0CC: gblomqui, jfrey, jhardy, obarenbo, simaishi
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: 5.7.3   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: container
Fixed In Version: 5.7.3.1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1458552 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-06-28 15:04:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Container Management Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1458552    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 2 CFME Bot 2017-06-05 13:56:02 UTC 
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/euwe:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/d7ed364c18d0f5f5498cc6d78458d128c586d383

commit d7ed364c18d0f5f5498cc6d78458d128c586d383
Author:     Oleg Barenboim <chessbyte>
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 1 23:56:00 2017 -0400
Commit:     Satoe Imaishi <simaishi>
CommitDate: Mon Jun 5 09:53:42 2017 -0400

    Merge pull request #14359 from zeari/delete_archived_entities_on_ems_delete
    
    Delete archived entities when a container manager is deleted
    (cherry picked from commit 48d0291098ab39b474cf4712d325d57260372fa0)
    
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458811

 app/models/manageiq/providers/container_manager.rb | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2017-06-28 15:04:49 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1601