Bug 146667

Summary:	RH-Bugzilla version does not differ from main stream bugzilla
Product:	[Community] Bugzilla	Reporter:	Jeff Pound <jpound>
Component:	Bugzilla General	Assignee:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Mike MacKenzie <mmackenz>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	2.18	CC:	overholt
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	2.18-rh	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-01-13 15:53:13 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeff Pound 2005-01-31 17:19:11 UTC

Description of problem:
The rh-bugzilla uses the same version identifiers as the main stream
bugzilla. This makes machine processing of bugs difficult because
there isnt a way of determining the type of bugzilla install (RH or
main stream).

Heres an example:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/xml.cgi?id=1

notice the version is "2.17.1"

Steps to Reproduce:
1. View a bug and look at the version
  
Actual results:
The version identifier doesnt differ from main stream bugzilla.

Expected results:
The version should identify this as a Red Hat Bugzilla system (for
example: "2.17.1-rh".

Comment 1 David Lawrence 2005-08-24 16:52:44 UTC

Moving to 2.18 since same problem there. Will change the version to be more rh
specific.

Comment 2 Bug Testing 2006-01-13 15:43:57 UTC

Any news on this, Dave?  We're looking at making the Eclipse bugzilla plugin use
XML-RPC for RH bugzilla but we can't do that until we can differentiate between
RH and another bugzilla installation.

Thanks.

Comment 3 David Lawrence 2006-01-13 15:53:13 UTC

Sorry for the delay on this. It fell off my radar due to other things. I have
changed it to 2.18-rh.

Dave

Comment 4 Andrew Overholt 2006-01-13 16:00:26 UTC

Thanks very much!