Bug 1468888
| Summary: | pngquant-2.10.1 is available | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring> | ||||
| Component: | pngquant | Assignee: | Sergio Basto <sergio> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | besser82, manisandro, sergio | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Triaged | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | pngquant-2.10.1-2.fc26 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-07-17 04:51:51 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Upstream Release Monitoring
2017-07-09 12:26:50 UTC
Created attachment 1295616 [details]
[patch] Update to 2.10.1 (#1468888)
hotness's scratch build of pngquant-2.10.1-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20421004 Hello , Sandro I'd like that you also takeover this package , updates of libimagequant [1] and pngquant should go together ... , what do you think ? if you accept it, please ask for commits and or commit permissions in [2] Thanks, [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468886 [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pngquant/ Sure fine for me, ACLs requested. So just for curiosity, is there an actual hard API dependency between pngquant and libimagequant which requires them to have the same version? In which case pngquant should have a hard-versioned dependency on libimagequant? (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #4) > Sure fine for me, ACLs requested. ACLs approved > So just for curiosity, is there an actual hard API dependency between > pngquant and libimagequant which requires them to have the same version? In > which case pngquant should have a hard-versioned dependency on libimagequant? I think pngquant and libimagequant, now, do not require same version , the problem is libimagequant haven't soname and neither an API version , so when api change pngquant can change and usually is done in same version , conclusion we should use same versions, to ensure that work as expect. Thanks Ok - so for safety perhaps better adding a hard requires on the version? Ah, which it already has I see, ok never mind :) yes , thanks :) smani's pngquant-2.10.1-1.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=916923 besser82's pngquant-2.10.1-2.fc27 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=916924 libimagequant-2.10.1-1.fc26 pngquant-2.10.1-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6f2b340f8d @Björn Esser If you want to take care of the package I have no objections, but could you state that beforehand to avoid duplicating each others work? libimagequant-2.10.1-1.fc26, pngquant-2.10.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6f2b340f8d libimagequant-2.10.1-1.fc26, pngquant-2.10.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |