Bug 1471314
| Summary: | Provisioning on Azure fails due to lack of UDF driver in main kernel modules | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Brent Baude <bbaude> |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 26 | CC: | bbreard, dustymabe, gansalmon, ichavero, itamar, jonathan, kernel-maint, labbott, madhu.chinakonda, mchehab |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | kernel-4.12.5-300.fc26 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-08-14 21:51:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Brent Baude
2017-07-15 00:28:13 UTC
The udf module should just be in kernel modules and not kernel-modules-extra. can you double check? (In reply to Laura Abbott from comment #1) > The udf module should just be in kernel modules and not > kernel-modules-extra. can you double check? She seems to be right: ``` [vagrant@vanilla-f26atomic ~]$ sudo modprobe udf [vagrant@vanilla-f26atomic ~]$ lsmod | grep udf udf 94208 0 crc_itu_t 16384 1 udf [vagrant@vanilla-f26atomic ~]$ sudo modinfo udf filename: /lib/modules/4.11.8-300.fc26.x86_64/kernel/fs/udf/udf.ko.xz license: GPL description: Universal Disk Format Filesystem author: Ben Fennema alias: fs-udf depends: crc-itu-t intree: Y vermagic: 4.11.8-300.fc26.x86_64 SMP mod_unload signat: PKCS#7 signer: sig_key: sig_hashalgo: md4 ``` I checked Fedora 25 as well. ok me again - I think brent was trying both of our images we put out for clouds. We have cloud base and atomic host. The cloud base image does not have kernel-modules installed at all, which seems to work for most cloud environments. ``` $ rpm -qa | grep kernel kernel-headers-4.11.9-300.fc26.x86_64 kernel-core-4.11.8-300.fc26.x86_64 ``` Atomic Host does have the kernel-module package installed because the atomic host ostree has to support both cloud environments and bare metal (various hardware) environments. I guess the only way to solve this for cloud base is to make the kernel module not be a module and be compiled in. We can have modules in kernel-core as well. I made a scratch build https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20583661 that should keep udf in the kernel-core package. (In reply to Laura Abbott from comment #4) > We can have modules in kernel-core as well. I made a scratch build > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20583661 that should > keep udf in the kernel-core package. Thanks - i think brent went AFK for a week this morning. I'll build an image for him and gather some feedback from him when he gets back. Here is an ISO with the new kernel-core in it: https://dustymabe.fedorapeople.org/f26-kernel-core-udf.qcow2 ``` [fedora@cloudhost ~]$ rpm -q kernel-core kernel-core-4.11.11-300.rhbz1471314.fc26.x86_64 [fedora@cloudhost ~]$ lsmod | grep udf [fedora@cloudhost ~]$ modprobe udf modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'udf': Operation not permitted [fedora@cloudhost ~]$ sudo modprobe udf [fedora@cloudhost ~]$ lsmod | grep udf udf 94208 0 crc_itu_t 16384 1 udf ``` Dusty, Ill be back 7/31. Is that an ISO or a bootable image? The latter is the preferred. (In reply to Brent Baude from comment #7) > Dusty, > > Ill be back 7/31. Is that an ISO or a bootable image? The latter is the > preferred. it's a bootable qcow This did the trick. I'll defer to you guys on how to implement it (In reply to Laura Abbott from comment #4) > We can have modules in kernel-core as well. I made a scratch build > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20583661 that should > keep udf in the kernel-core package. thanks laura, according to brent that worked. Could we move the udf module to kernel-core? I pushed the commit to F26 and rawhide. This will show up in the next builds. (In reply to Laura Abbott from comment #11) > I pushed the commit to F26 and rawhide. This will show up in the next builds. :cheers: - thanks Laura! kernel-4.12.5-300.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-adc7d95627 kernel-4.12.5-300.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-adc7d95627 kernel-4.12.5-300.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |