Bug 1472083

Summary: Include supportability statement for RHEL EUS repos in RHOSP installation guide
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Jaison Raju <jraju>
Component: documentationAssignee: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 10.0 (Newton)CC: jraju, mburns, mschuppe, nlevinki, rhos-docs, srevivo, vfarias
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1471796 Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-07-07 09:44:09 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1471796, 1472085, 1472086, 1472087    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Jaison Raju 2017-07-18 04:32:14 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1471796 +++

Although it's informed in several places [1][2][3] that it's not supported to use Extended Update Support repos in RHOSP, I believe the most important place to have this information is in the Installation Guide, which is the document most customers should be following to deploy the software.

Although having the information in Release Notes[1] could be considered enough, I believe implementation details should always be in the installation guide. I understand that using EUS isn't exactly an implementation detail, but this may not be clear enough to every customer.

1: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/11/html/release_notes/content_delivery_network_cdn_channels
2: https://access.redhat.com/node/493953
3: https://access.redhat.com/articles/2969081

--- Additional comment from Mike Burns on 2017-07-17 12:23:52 EDT ---

I agree, there are 3 locations mentioned here[1] that could/should be updated:

[1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/11/html/product_guide/ch-rhosp-software#sect-subscriptions

Comment 1 Martin Lopes 2017-09-25 04:07:34 UTC
Moved bug to OSP11, as thats where the docs were linked to in the bug description.
Person working on this bug must still consider whether the changes should be backported.

Comment 2 Vagner Farias 2017-10-02 11:16:13 UTC
In fact this is already a cloned bug asking for this to be backported to OSP10. Bz #1471796 is for OSP11. Shouldn't this be kept in OSP10?

Comment 3 Martin Lopes 2017-10-10 05:29:11 UTC
Makes sense, moving back to 10.