Bug 1472083 - Include supportability statement for RHEL EUS repos in RHOSP installation guide
Summary: Include supportability statement for RHEL EUS repos in RHOSP installation guide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: documentation
Version: 10.0 (Newton)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: RHOS Documentation Team
QA Contact: RHOS Documentation Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1471796 1472085 1472086 1472087
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-07-18 04:32 UTC by Jaison Raju
Modified: 2022-08-11 10:23 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1471796
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-07-07 09:44:09 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-5983 0 None None None 2022-08-11 10:23:17 UTC

Description Jaison Raju 2017-07-18 04:32:14 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1471796 +++

Although it's informed in several places [1][2][3] that it's not supported to use Extended Update Support repos in RHOSP, I believe the most important place to have this information is in the Installation Guide, which is the document most customers should be following to deploy the software.

Although having the information in Release Notes[1] could be considered enough, I believe implementation details should always be in the installation guide. I understand that using EUS isn't exactly an implementation detail, but this may not be clear enough to every customer.

1: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/11/html/release_notes/content_delivery_network_cdn_channels
2: https://access.redhat.com/node/493953
3: https://access.redhat.com/articles/2969081

--- Additional comment from Mike Burns on 2017-07-17 12:23:52 EDT ---

I agree, there are 3 locations mentioned here[1] that could/should be updated:

[1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openstack_platform/11/html/product_guide/ch-rhosp-software#sect-subscriptions

Comment 1 Martin Lopes 2017-09-25 04:07:34 UTC
Moved bug to OSP11, as thats where the docs were linked to in the bug description.
Person working on this bug must still consider whether the changes should be backported.

Comment 2 Vagner Farias 2017-10-02 11:16:13 UTC
In fact this is already a cloned bug asking for this to be backported to OSP10. Bz #1471796 is for OSP11. Shouldn't this be kept in OSP10?

Comment 3 Martin Lopes 2017-10-10 05:29:11 UTC
Makes sense, moving back to 10.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.