Bug 1472868
Summary: | With RGWs configured in a load balancer, quota stats cache doesn't work | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Benjamin Schmaus <bschmaus> |
Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Orit Wasserman <owasserm> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vidushi Mishra <vimishra> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 2.3 | CC: | anharris, cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, gmeno, hnallurv, jbrier, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, mhackett, mwatts, owasserm, smanjara, sweil, tchandra, tserlin |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 3.1 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | RHEL: ceph-12.2.5-12.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.5-3redhat1xenial | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.Quota stats cache is no longer invalid
Previously in {product}, quota values sometimes were not properly decremented. This could cause exceed errors when the quota was not actually exceeded.
With this update to Ceph, quota values are properly decremented and no incorrect errors are printed.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-09-26 18:16:41 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1523246 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1473188, 1473436, 1584264 |
Description
Benjamin Schmaus
2017-07-19 14:55:01 UTC
Additional fix is needed, upstream pr: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17116 @orit, Could you please suggest a reproducer for this? (In reply to shilpa from comment #9) > @orit, > > Could you please suggest a reproducer for this? Hi Shilpa, You will need a cluster with at least two radosgw. You will need to configure a load balancer for example HAproxy. Use a script that does several PUT objects and than several DELETE objects. The load balancer would send the requests to different radosgws and you should hit the bug. Moving back to assigned based on Marcus' comments above. Matt/Orit Is this something we have ability to fix/retest in the next week? Thanks Orit! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2819 |