Bug 1474404

Summary: TypeError while refreshing a scvmm provider
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Niladri Roy <niroy>
Component: ProvidersAssignee: Daniel Berger <dberger>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Tasos Papaioannou <tpapaioa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.8.0CC: bsorota, cpelland, gblomqui, jdeubel, jfrey, jhardy, niroy, obarenbo, sputhenp, tpapaioa
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: TestOnly, ZStream
Target Release: 5.9.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.9.0.1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1479972 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-06 15:01:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1479972    

Description Niladri Roy 2017-07-24 14:19:24 UTC
Description of problem:
During refresh of SCVMM provider typerror is raised

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.8.0.17


How reproducible:
Customer environment, every single refresh

Steps to Reproduce:
1. initiate refresh against scvmm
2.
3.

Actual results:
[----] E, [2017-07-24T15:21:54.943063 #6637:95f13c] ERROR -- : MIQ(ManageIQ::Providers::Microsoft::InfraManager::Refresher#refresh) EMS: [MSSCVMM], id: [1000000000007] Refresh failed
[----] E, [2017-07-24T15:21:54.943265 #6637:95f13c] ERROR -- : [TypeError]: no implicit conversion of String into Integer  Method:[rescue in block in refresh]


Expected results:
refresh should progress


Additional info:
BUG 1368169 had similar issue where type error was Symbol to Integer
ERROR -- : [TypeError]: no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer  Method:[rescue in block in refresh]

Comment 4 Bronagh Sorota 2017-07-26 14:30:28 UTC
Hi Niladri,
Do you need some information from me? I See you set the needsinfo flag.

thanks

Comment 5 Niladri Roy 2017-07-26 14:36:35 UTC
Hi Bronagh,

Just to confirm, i believe this is similar to BUG 1368169 and not a duplicate?
Please correct me if I am wrong.

regards,
Niladri

Comment 6 Bronagh Sorota 2017-07-26 16:16:11 UTC
That is correct, similar but not the same.

Comment 15 Tasos Papaioannou 2017-11-28 20:09:39 UTC
Verified on 5.9.0.11.