Bug 1474404 - TypeError while refreshing a scvmm provider
Summary: TypeError while refreshing a scvmm provider
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Providers (Show other bugs)
(Show other bugs)
Version: 5.8.0
Hardware: x86_64 Unspecified
high
low
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.9.0
Assignee: Daniel Berger
QA Contact: Tasos Papaioannou
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: TestOnly, ZStream
Depends On:
Blocks: 1479972
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-07-24 14:19 UTC by Niladri Roy
Modified: 2018-03-06 15:01 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.9.0.1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1479972 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-06 15:01:19 UTC
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Niladri Roy 2017-07-24 14:19:24 UTC
Description of problem:
During refresh of SCVMM provider typerror is raised

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.8.0.17


How reproducible:
Customer environment, every single refresh

Steps to Reproduce:
1. initiate refresh against scvmm
2.
3.

Actual results:
[----] E, [2017-07-24T15:21:54.943063 #6637:95f13c] ERROR -- : MIQ(ManageIQ::Providers::Microsoft::InfraManager::Refresher#refresh) EMS: [MSSCVMM], id: [1000000000007] Refresh failed
[----] E, [2017-07-24T15:21:54.943265 #6637:95f13c] ERROR -- : [TypeError]: no implicit conversion of String into Integer  Method:[rescue in block in refresh]


Expected results:
refresh should progress


Additional info:
BUG 1368169 had similar issue where type error was Symbol to Integer
ERROR -- : [TypeError]: no implicit conversion of Symbol into Integer  Method:[rescue in block in refresh]

Comment 4 Bronagh Sorota 2017-07-26 14:30:28 UTC
Hi Niladri,
Do you need some information from me? I See you set the needsinfo flag.

thanks

Comment 5 Niladri Roy 2017-07-26 14:36:35 UTC
Hi Bronagh,

Just to confirm, i believe this is similar to BUG 1368169 and not a duplicate?
Please correct me if I am wrong.

regards,
Niladri

Comment 6 Bronagh Sorota 2017-07-26 16:16:11 UTC
That is correct, similar but not the same.

Comment 15 Tasos Papaioannou 2017-11-28 20:09:39 UTC
Verified on 5.9.0.11.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.