Bug 1477736

Summary:	rebase udisks2
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	David Lehman <dlehman>
Component:	udisks2	Assignee:	Vojtech Trefny <vtrefny>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.5	CC:	bmilar, dlehman, jkoten, mthacker, tpelka, yselkowi
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	Rebase
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	udisks2-2.7.3-1	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-04-10 15:43:20 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1480294, 1510667, 1525418
Bug Blocks:	1469559

Description David Lehman 2017-08-02 18:48:51 UTC

A rebase of udisks2 will pick up a great deal of work on modularity and stability,  including the work done under the storaged fork.

AFAIK this rebase would enable the cockpit team to drop the cockpit-storaged package.

New dependencies: libblockdev (in fedora since F18 or so, used by blivet/anaconda since then)


(new) udisks2 upstream: https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/
libblockdev upstream: https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/

Comment 8 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-12-14 11:24:35 UTC

Failing QA due to bug #1525418

Comment 9 Yaakov Selkowitz 2017-12-14 21:53:18 UTC

(In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #8)
> Failing QA due to bug #1525418

Should be fixed in bug 1510667.

Comment 10 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-12-19 12:47:14 UTC

Moving back to assigned and failing QE again.
changing the package which was requiring storaged doesn't fix a wrong spec file in udisks2.
Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

Comment 11 Yaakov Selkowitz 2017-12-19 15:26:36 UTC

(In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #10)
> Moving back to assigned and failing QE again.

How so exactly?

> changing the package which was requiring storaged doesn't fix a wrong spec
> file in udisks2.

It does, because...

> Please see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.
> 2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

Which explicitly says:

"If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the Obsoletes: line from the above example."

I believe this is such a case.

Comment 12 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-12-21 08:45:50 UTC

(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #11)

> "If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a
> sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the
> Obsoletes: line from the above example."
> 
> I believe this is such a case.

Ok, fir enough, moving back to QE

Comment 13 Bohdan Milar 2018-01-16 12:21:40 UTC

New version available on all archs. TPS OK.

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 15:43:20 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0868