RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1477736 - rebase udisks2
Summary: rebase udisks2
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: udisks2
Version: 7.5
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Vojtech Trefny
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1480294 1510667 1525418
Blocks: 1469559
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-08-02 18:48 UTC by David Lehman
Modified: 2021-09-06 12:34 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: udisks2-2.7.3-1
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-10 15:43:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1055223 0 unspecified CLOSED Safely remove is not working (or broken) as expected in Gnome Disks 2021-09-06 12:33:44 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1464953 0 unspecified CLOSED logical volume resize fails with error message 2021-09-06 12:33:21 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1527320 1 None None None 2021-01-20 06:05:38 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2018:0868 0 None None None 2018-04-10 15:44:11 UTC

Internal Links: 1055223 1464953 1527320

Description David Lehman 2017-08-02 18:48:51 UTC 
A rebase of udisks2 will pick up a great deal of work on modularity and stability,  including the work done under the storaged fork.

AFAIK this rebase would enable the cockpit team to drop the cockpit-storaged package.

New dependencies: libblockdev (in fedora since F18 or so, used by blivet/anaconda since then)


(new) udisks2 upstream: https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/
libblockdev upstream: https://github.com/storaged-project/libblockdev/
Comment 8 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-12-14 11:24:35 UTC 
Failing QA due to bug #1525418
Comment 9 Yaakov Selkowitz 2017-12-14 21:53:18 UTC 
(In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #8)
> Failing QA due to bug #1525418

Should be fixed in bug 1510667.
Comment 10 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-12-19 12:47:14 UTC 
Moving back to assigned and failing QE again.
changing the package which was requiring storaged doesn't fix a wrong spec file in udisks2.
Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
Comment 11 Yaakov Selkowitz 2017-12-19 15:26:36 UTC 
(In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #10)
> Moving back to assigned and failing QE again.

How so exactly?

> changing the package which was requiring storaged doesn't fix a wrong spec
> file in udisks2.

It does, because...

> Please see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.
> 2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

Which explicitly says:

"If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the Obsoletes: line from the above example."

I believe this is such a case.
Comment 12 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-12-21 08:45:50 UTC 
(In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #11)

> "If a package supersedes/replaces an existing package without being a
> sufficiently compatible replacement as defined above, use only the
> Obsoletes: line from the above example."
> 
> I believe this is such a case.

Ok, fir enough, moving back to QE
Comment 13 Bohdan Milar 2018-01-16 12:21:40 UTC 
New version available on all archs. TPS OK.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2018-04-10 15:43:20 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0868
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.