Bug 1478479
Summary: | RHV: Adapt to qemu-kvm-rhev RHEL 8 packaging layout changes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Jeff Nelson <jen> |
Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Ryan Barry <rbarry> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Nisim Simsolo <nsimsolo> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | aliang, areis, asabadra, chayang, coli, hreitz, jen, jsuchane, juzhang, lsurette, michal.skrivanek, mrezanin, mtessun, ngu, pkrempa, rbarry, redhat-bugzilla, Rhev-m-bugs, rjones, sbonazzo, srevivo, tjelinek, virt-maint, xuwei, ycui |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.4.0 | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | rhv-4.4.0-29 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1425820 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2020-04-16 10:36:17 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Virt | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1378536, 1425820, 1478465, 1588603, 1588606 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1447858, 1478480 |
Description
Jeff Nelson
2017-08-04 15:56:19 UTC
we do not use "distribution" component, tracking under vdsm for now. Though perhaps it is an opportunity to move qemu dependencies to ovirt-host? Sandro, what do you think? (In reply to Michal Skrivanek from comment #1) > we do not use "distribution" component, tracking under vdsm for now. Though > perhaps it is an opportunity to move qemu dependencies to ovirt-host? > Sandro, what do you think? VDSM uses qemu-kvm directly so the requirement should stay in VDSM. In oVirt Host we are requiring vdsm package so you can't depend on it from vdsm side or you'll get a circular dependency. Re-targeting to 4.3.1 since it is missing a patch, an acked blocker flag, or both Sandro, is this still relevant at all? (In reply to Ryan Barry from comment #5) > Sandro, is this still relevant at all? I think that vdsm spec file has been already updated for consuming the change already in 4.3.5 or so. Since 4.3.6 had no issues using qemu-kvm-rhev / qemu-kvm-ev I'm closing this current release in 4.3.6 Sorry, correcting myself, this is for RHEL 8, not RHEL 7.6. So moving to QA for 4.4. vdsm has been already updated to consume virt module and new qemu-kvm build there. WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops WARN: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops: Bug status (ON_QA) wasn't changed but the folowing should be fixed: [Found non-acked flags: '{}', ] For more info please contact: rhv-devops Closing low severity bugs, based on QE capacity, if you would like to still verify this issue please reopen. *** Bug 1588606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |