Bug 1480819

Summary: 'OSP Director > Scale Infrastructure Provider' is incomprehensible for users
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Jerome Marc <jmarc>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Scott Seago <sseago>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Ido Ovadia <iovadia>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.8.0CC: hkataria, jhardy, jmarc, mpovolny, obarenbo, simaishi, slucidi, smallamp, sseago
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: Reopened
Target Release: 5.11.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: usability:openstack
Fixed In Version: 5.11.0.1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-12-12 13:33:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: Openstack Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Example of Scale Infrastructure for OSP Provider none

Description Jerome Marc 2017-08-12 00:13:58 UTC
Created attachment 1312349 [details]
Example of Scale Infrastructure for OSP Provider

Description of problem:
'Scale Infrastructure Provider' under OSP Director provider is not user friendly:
- there are no explanation on what the fields mean 
- there are no labels
- there is no documentation
As a end user, I have no idea how this works. Screen is not intuitive at all.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.8.1.5.20170725160636_e433fc0

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Go to an OSP Director Provider
2. Click on Configuration > Scale Infrastructure Provider

Actual results:
Incomprehensible screen.

Expected results:
Some guidance on what to do.

Additional info:
See attached screenshot.

Comment 2 Dave Johnson 2017-08-16 20:28:25 UTC
Please assess the impact of this issue and update the severity accordingly.  Please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity for a reminder on each severity's definition.

If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set it to Low/Low.

Comment 4 Scott Seago 2018-11-08 15:45:04 UTC
Fix is here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4896

The PR fixes the form labels. Previously, they were just displaying the internal parameter names from the orchestration stack. Now, instead of "ComputeCount" the user will see "Number of Compute Hosts", etc. As for further guidance, adding textual documentation on the screen seems to be inconsistent with the remainder of MIQ/CloudForms style, but there is already validation in place that makes it clear that the number of hosts specified across the host/node types should be equal to or less than the total available as displayed on the form. For example, if "Number of Hosts" shows on the form as 3, and the user selects 2 compute nodes, 1 controller node, and a ceph storage node, "Assigning 4 but only have 3 hosts available"

Comment 6 Sam Lucidi 2019-01-08 19:21:43 UTC
Reopening and moving to POST, since this was ON_DEV when it got autoclosed and the fix has since been merged.

Comment 7 Ido Ovadia 2019-08-21 14:42:57 UTC

(In reply to Scott Seago from comment #4)
> Fix is here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4896
> 
> The PR fixes the form labels. Previously, they were just displaying the
> internal parameter names from the orchestration stack. Now, instead of
> "ComputeCount" the user will see "Number of Compute Hosts", etc. As for
> further guidance, adding textual documentation on the screen seems to be
> inconsistent with the remainder of MIQ/CloudForms style, but there is
> already validation in place that makes it clear that the number of hosts
> specified across the host/node types should be equal to or less than the
> total available as displayed on the form. For example, if "Number of Hosts"
> shows on the form as 3, and the user selects 2 compute nodes, 1 controller
> node, and a ceph storage node, "Assigning 4 but only have 3 hosts available"

@ Scott,could you please add the relevant information on documentation (infrastructure_inventory.pdf)
Currently, on 4.7  only scaling down is documented

Comment 8 Ido Ovadia 2019-08-21 14:43:57 UTC
Verified
========
5.11.0.19

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2019-12-12 13:33:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199

Comment 11 Scott Seago 2021-04-26 13:15:12 UTC
Clearing stale needinfo.