Created attachment 1312349 [details] Example of Scale Infrastructure for OSP Provider Description of problem: 'Scale Infrastructure Provider' under OSP Director provider is not user friendly: - there are no explanation on what the fields mean - there are no labels - there is no documentation As a end user, I have no idea how this works. Screen is not intuitive at all. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.8.1.5.20170725160636_e433fc0 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to an OSP Director Provider 2. Click on Configuration > Scale Infrastructure Provider Actual results: Incomprehensible screen. Expected results: Some guidance on what to do. Additional info: See attached screenshot.
Please assess the impact of this issue and update the severity accordingly. Please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity for a reminder on each severity's definition. If it's something like a tracker bug where it doesn't matter, please set it to Low/Low.
Fix is here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4896 The PR fixes the form labels. Previously, they were just displaying the internal parameter names from the orchestration stack. Now, instead of "ComputeCount" the user will see "Number of Compute Hosts", etc. As for further guidance, adding textual documentation on the screen seems to be inconsistent with the remainder of MIQ/CloudForms style, but there is already validation in place that makes it clear that the number of hosts specified across the host/node types should be equal to or less than the total available as displayed on the form. For example, if "Number of Hosts" shows on the form as 3, and the user selects 2 compute nodes, 1 controller node, and a ceph storage node, "Assigning 4 but only have 3 hosts available"
Reopening and moving to POST, since this was ON_DEV when it got autoclosed and the fix has since been merged.
(In reply to Scott Seago from comment #4) > Fix is here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/4896 > > The PR fixes the form labels. Previously, they were just displaying the > internal parameter names from the orchestration stack. Now, instead of > "ComputeCount" the user will see "Number of Compute Hosts", etc. As for > further guidance, adding textual documentation on the screen seems to be > inconsistent with the remainder of MIQ/CloudForms style, but there is > already validation in place that makes it clear that the number of hosts > specified across the host/node types should be equal to or less than the > total available as displayed on the form. For example, if "Number of Hosts" > shows on the form as 3, and the user selects 2 compute nodes, 1 controller > node, and a ceph storage node, "Assigning 4 but only have 3 hosts available" @ Scott,could you please add the relevant information on documentation (infrastructure_inventory.pdf) Currently, on 4.7 only scaling down is documented
Verified ======== 5.11.0.19
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199
Clearing stale needinfo.