Bug 1487419
| Summary: | Review Request: wsprx - Weak Signal Propagation Reporter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | eclipseo, fedora, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-09-01 21:59:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jaroslav Škarvada
2017-08-31 21:06:34 UTC
>Group: Applications/Engineering The "Group" tag should not be used. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections >%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/wsprx.png This directory has an unknown owner. You should add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme". Hello,
Additionally:
- You can replace make %{?_smp_mflags} install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} with %make_install
- make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
- Why do you make a -doc subpackage for a single file? Just include it in the %doc directive:
%files
%doc WSPR-X_Users_Guide.pdf
- Why do you want to convert the docx to a PDF? And why do you pull Libreoffice Writer (which is a huge dependency) to just do that?
If you feel necessary to join the help in PDF, I think it would be better to add it as Source1 with a comment on how you converted it. (for that I suggest you to also look at pandoc, a command line tool to convert to and from multiple format).
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > - Why do you make a -doc subpackage for a single file? Just include it in > the %doc directive: > > %files > %doc WSPR-X_Users_Guide.pdf > That's intended, not everybody needs the guide. > - Why do you want to convert the docx to a PDF? Because docx is um, non optimal format. Not everybody has reader for it. And btw upstream also converts to PDF and ships PDF in binary package. > And why do you pull > Libreoffice Writer (which is a huge dependency) to just do that? > Not an issue, build time dep. > If you feel necessary to join the help in PDF, I think it would be better to > add it as Source1 with a comment on how you converted it. (for that I It's better to automate and convert it in build time instead of ad-hoc manual hacks. > suggest you to also look at pandoc, a command line tool to convert to and > from multiple format). Libreoffice do a much better job. Btw at the moment I am trying to package WSJT-X, which is a bit tricky. According to upstream WSJT-X superseded WSPR-X, so if I successfully package it, I will probably drop this request - if not, I will go with WSPR-X instead (it can still do the job). Upstream statement regarding WSPR-X and WSJT-X: "I do not recommend packaging WSPR-X for any platform or distribution. WSPR-X is obsolete, and no longer supported. Its functions are limited, and anyway now much better served by WSJT-X." WSJT-X review request is in bug 1487776. So closing this. |