Bug 1487419 - Review Request: wsprx - Weak Signal Propagation Reporter
Summary: Review Request: wsprx - Weak Signal Propagation Reporter
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-08-31 21:06 UTC by Jaroslav Škarvada
Modified: 2017-09-01 21:59 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-01 21:59:54 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jaroslav Škarvada 2017-08-31 21:06:34 UTC
Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/wsprx/wsprx.spec
SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/wsprx/wsprx-0.9-1.20170831svn8046.fc25.src.rpm
Description: WSPR implements a protocol designed for probing potential radio signal propagation paths with low-power transmissions. Normal transmissions carry a station's callsign, Maidenhead grid locator, and transmitter power in dBm. This program can decode signals with S/N as low as -28 dB in a 2500 Hz bandwidth. Stations with internet access can automatically upload their reception reports to a central database called WSPRnet, which includes a mapping facility.
Fedora Account System Username: jskarvad

Comment 1 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki 2017-08-31 22:07:24 UTC
>Group:		Applications/Engineering
The "Group" tag should not be used. 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections

>%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/wsprx.png
This directory has an unknown owner. You should add "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme".

Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-09-01 15:57:10 UTC
Hello,


Additionally:

 - You can replace make %{?_smp_mflags} install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} with %make_install
 - make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build

 - Why do you make a -doc subpackage for a single file? Just include it in the %doc directive:

%files
%doc WSPR-X_Users_Guide.pdf

 - Why do you want to convert the docx to a PDF? And why do you pull Libreoffice Writer (which is a huge dependency) to just do that?

If you feel necessary to join the help in PDF, I think it would be better to add it as Source1 with a comment on how you converted it. (for that I suggest you to also look at pandoc, a command line tool to convert to and from multiple format).

Comment 3 Jaroslav Škarvada 2017-09-01 16:28:09 UTC
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
>  - Why do you make a -doc subpackage for a single file? Just include it in
> the %doc directive:
> 
> %files
> %doc WSPR-X_Users_Guide.pdf
> 
That's intended, not everybody needs the guide.

>  - Why do you want to convert the docx to a PDF?
Because docx is um, non optimal format. Not everybody has reader for it. And btw upstream also converts to PDF and ships PDF in binary package.

> And why do you pull
> Libreoffice Writer (which is a huge dependency) to just do that?
>
Not an issue, build time dep.
 
> If you feel necessary to join the help in PDF, I think it would be better to
> add it as Source1 with a comment on how you converted it. (for that I
It's better to automate and convert it in build time instead of ad-hoc manual hacks.

> suggest you to also look at pandoc, a command line tool to convert to and
> from multiple format).
Libreoffice do a much better job.

Comment 4 Jaroslav Škarvada 2017-09-01 16:31:21 UTC
Btw at the moment I am trying to package WSJT-X, which is a bit tricky. According to upstream WSJT-X superseded WSPR-X, so if I successfully package it, I will probably drop this request - if not, I will go with WSPR-X instead (it can still do the job).

Comment 5 Jaroslav Škarvada 2017-09-01 21:59:54 UTC
Upstream statement regarding WSPR-X and WSJT-X:
"I do not recommend packaging WSPR-X for any platform or distribution.  WSPR-X is obsolete, and no longer supported. Its functions are limited, and anyway now much better served by WSJT-X."

WSJT-X review request is in bug 1487776.

So closing this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.