Bug 1491966

Summary:	AFR entry self heal removes a directory's .glusterfs symlink.
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
Component:	posix	Assignee:	Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	3.10	CC:	bugs
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	glusterfs-3.10.6	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1477169	Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-10-06 17:11:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1477169
Bug Blocks:	1479118

Description Ravishankar N 2017-09-15 07:35:45 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1477169 +++

Description of problem:
$subject

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
-Create 1x2 replica, fuse mount it
-mkdir fuse_mount/d1
-mkdir fuse_mount/d1/dir
-mkdir fuse_mount/d2
-kill one brick and rename the dir: `mv fuse_mount/d1/dir use_mount/d2`
-Bring all bricks up and trigger heal.

Actual results:
fuse_mount/d2/dir won't have any gfid symlink.

Additional info:
For replica 3 volume, the heal won't even complete, see the .t attached.

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-08-01 08:06:07 EDT ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17945 (posix: add sanity checks for removing the gfid symlink for directories) posted (#1) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar)

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-08-02 10:59:12 EDT ---

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/17945 (posix: add sanity checks for removing the gfid symlink for directories) posted (#2) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar)

--- Additional comment from Worker Ant on 2017-08-04 11:54:05 EDT ---

COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/17945 committed in master by Jeff Darcy (jeff.us) 
------
commit 42c057a6d1a03dd2825a278393acb15d52220c8d
Author: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
Date:   Mon Jul 31 23:38:20 2017 +0530

    posix: add sanity checks for removing the gfid symlink for directories
    
    ...during mkdir and rmdir. Otherwise, during entry self-heal, the
    directory could be left out without a .glusterfs symlink causing fops like
    opendir, readdir to fail.  The only chance the missing symlink will be
    created is when a fresh lookup comes on it.
    
    Change-Id: I2e1cf1bce8962ea80187edd8f6d73e0a09cf9f8e
    BUG: 1477169
    Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
    Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17945
    Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org>
    Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra>

Comment 1 Worker Ant 2017-09-15 07:37:02 UTC

REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/18299 (posix: add sanity checks for removing the gfid symlink for directories) posted (#1) for review on release-3.10 by Ravishankar N (ravishankar)

Comment 2 Worker Ant 2017-09-23 12:20:00 UTC

COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/18299 committed in release-3.10 by Shyamsundar Ranganathan (srangana) 
------
commit 4aa4bf3f14175c91d392032515b5c0f76359b3e9
Author: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
Date:   Fri Sep 15 13:04:09 2017 +0530

    posix: add sanity checks for removing the gfid symlink for directories
    
    Backport of https://review.gluster.org/17945
    
    ...during mkdir and rmdir. Otherwise, during entry self-heal, the
    directory could be left out without a .glusterfs symlink causing fops like
    opendir, readdir to fail.  The only chance the missing symlink will be
    created is when a fresh lookup comes on it.
    
    Change-Id: I2e1cf1bce8962ea80187edd8f6d73e0a09cf9f8e
    BUG: 1491966
    Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>

Comment 3 Shyamsundar 2017-10-06 17:11:53 UTC

This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.10.6, please open a new bug report.

glusterfs-3.10.6 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution.

[1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2017-October/000084.html
[2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/