Bug 1492142
Summary: | Make sure that the 'metrics' pool is created on major upgrade from OSP 9 to 10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Andreas Karis <akaris> |
Component: | openstack-tripleo | Assignee: | Marios Andreou <mandreou> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Arik Chernetsky <achernet> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 10.0 (Newton) | CC: | aschultz, mandreou, mburns, pkilambi, rhel-osp-director-maint, ssmolyak |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-09-25 22:00:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Andreas Karis
2017-09-15 15:08:33 UTC
Hi Andreas - we discussed this during the upgrades bug triage call today. mcornea identified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412295 (and also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461951) as a duplicate for this. It looks like the fix was to document the requirement for the operator. I am adding the TC for Telemetry needinfo pradk please can someone check this? Both to confirm the duplicate to BZ 1412295 and then did we land something to docs already or is that still pending? thanks (In reply to marios from comment #1) > Hi Andreas - we discussed this during the upgrades bug triage call today. > mcornea identified https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412295 (and > also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461951) as a duplicate for > this. It looks like the fix was to document the requirement for the > operator. > > I am adding the TC for Telemetry needinfo pradk please can someone check > this? Both to confirm the duplicate to BZ 1412295 and then did we land > something to docs already or is that still pending? > > thanks Yes this indeed a duplicate of 1412295. I dont see the other bug fixed yet, I put a need info. Hope it gets wrapped up soon. We can close this as dup i think Hi, Feel free to close this one as duplicate if the docs bug is being tracked elsewhere! Thanks! - Andreas *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1412295 *** |