Bug 1497633

Summary: Review Request: mediaextract - Extract media files that are embedded within other files
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Ye Cheng <18969068329>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: package-review, sergey.avseyev
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:57:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 177841, 201449    

Comment 1 Sergey Avseyev 2017-10-03 08:36:11 UTC
Would be better if you will use link, which can be resolved to the plain files/blobs. Your spec url should be http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/yecheng/mediaextract/mediaextract.git/plain/mediaextract.spec, instead of its HTML version

Comment 2 Sergey Avseyev 2017-10-03 08:46:09 UTC
Koji reports failed builds: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22233771

Comment 3 Ye Cheng 2017-10-04 13:27:12 UTC
Thanks. Fixed by removing -m64 and -m32 flags the upstream set in makefile, but I don't know how it will function on alternative architectures. I will test it in qemu.

Comment 4 Sergey Avseyev 2017-10-10 08:11:47 UTC
Not it compiles on koji https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22361632

Looks good to me. Are you going to remove "NotReady" once you will check it working on other platforms? If you can write some test for that, which can be applied as a patch, you can execute it automatically in the %check section of the spec.

Comment 6 Ye Cheng 2017-11-04 12:02:59 UTC
The check section only check whether the built binary is runnable, but not whether it will run correctly. This program probably will not work correctly consistently on architectures that do not support unaligned memory access, according to upstream readme.

Comment 8 Michael Schwendt 2017-11-11 22:18:54 UTC
> %patch0
> %patch1

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Patch_Guidelines


> %post
> if [ $1 = 1 ] ; then
>  mandb
> fi
> 
> %postun
> if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then
>   mandb
> fi

That's odd. First Fedora package ever I've seen that does.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Manpages

mandb is updated via systemd man-db.timer.

Comment 9 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:56:11 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 10 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:57:15 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.