Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||missing openoffice.org-* in x86_64/Fedora/RPMS|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Alexandre Oliva <oliva>|
|Component:||comps||Assignee:||Elliot Lee <sopwith>|
|Status:||CLOSED DUPLICATE||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2005-04-24 00:11:51 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Alexandre Oliva 2005-03-06 20:59:43 EST
The new package names for OOo-1.9 are not listed in the comps file for x86_64, and since they're i386-only, they don't make to the x86_64 compose. BTW, is there any reason for ecj and kdeaddons to still be in rawhide? The former appears to be superseded by eclipse-ecj, and the latter has a version number that indicates an older KDE version that the rest of the distro. IIRC, there's a file conflict reported by up2date as well. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rawhide-20050305
Comment 1 Alexandre Oliva 2005-03-16 21:18:31 EST
Many of the langpack packages were renamed, and the comps file needs updating.
Comment 2 Elliot Lee 2005-03-21 22:25:45 EST
These issues seem to have been resolved.
Comment 3 Alexandre Oliva 2005-03-22 23:48:18 EST
ecj and kdeaddons are fixed, indeed, but OOo is still missing several packages in the x86_64 tree. See below: [aoliva@livre development]$ diff <(find i386/Fedora/RPMS -name openoffice.org-*.rpm|sed 's,.*/,,'|sort) <(find x86_64/Fedora/RPMS -name openoffice.org-\*.rpm|sed 's,.*/,,'|sort) 6,7d5 < openoffice.org-javafilter-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-af_ZA-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 9,13d6 < openoffice.org-langpack-bg_BG-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-ca_ES-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-cs_CZ-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-cy_GB-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-da_DK-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 15d7 < openoffice.org-langpack-el_GR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 17,19d8 < openoffice.org-langpack-et_EE-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-eu_ES-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-fi_FI-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 21,24d9 < openoffice.org-langpack-gl_ES-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-he_IL-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-hi_IN-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-hu_HU-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 26,31d10 < openoffice.org-langpack-ja_JP-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-kn_IN-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-ko_KR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-lt_LT-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-ms_MY-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-nb_NO-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 33,36d11 < openoffice.org-langpack-nn_NO-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-pl_PL-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-pt_BR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-pt_PT-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 38,39d12 < openoffice.org-langpack-sk_SK-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-sl_SI-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 41,45d13 < openoffice.org-langpack-th_TH-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-tr_TR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-zh_CN-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-zh_TW-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-langpack-zu_ZA-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm 47,48d14 < openoffice.org-pyuno-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm < openoffice.org-testtools-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm The above is from rawhide-20050322
Comment 4 Alexandre Oliva 2005-04-06 01:01:47 EDT
Same problem in today's rawhide, as well as FC4-re0405.0.