Bug 150450

Summary:	missing openoffice.org-* in x86_64/Fedora/RPMS
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Alexandre Oliva <oliva>
Component:	comps	Assignee:	Elliot Lee <sopwith>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-04-24 04:11:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexandre Oliva 2005-03-07 01:59:43 UTC

The new package names for OOo-1.9 are not listed in the comps file for
x86_64, and since they're i386-only, they don't make to the x86_64
compose.

BTW, is there any reason for ecj and kdeaddons to still be in rawhide?
 The former appears to be superseded by eclipse-ecj, and the latter
has a version number that indicates an older KDE version that the rest
of the distro.  IIRC, there's a file conflict reported by up2date as well.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rawhide-20050305

Comment 1 Alexandre Oliva 2005-03-17 02:18:31 UTC

Many of the langpack packages were renamed, and the comps file needs updating.

Comment 2 Elliot Lee 2005-03-22 03:25:45 UTC

These issues seem to have been resolved.

Comment 3 Alexandre Oliva 2005-03-23 04:48:18 UTC

ecj and kdeaddons are fixed, indeed, but OOo is still missing several packages
in the x86_64 tree.  See below:

[aoliva@livre development]$ diff <(find i386/Fedora/RPMS -name
openoffice.org-*.rpm|sed 's,.*/,,'|sort) <(find x86_64/Fedora/RPMS -name
openoffice.org-\*.rpm|sed 's,.*/,,'|sort)
6,7d5
< openoffice.org-javafilter-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-af_ZA-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
9,13d6
< openoffice.org-langpack-bg_BG-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-ca_ES-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-cs_CZ-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-cy_GB-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-da_DK-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
15d7
< openoffice.org-langpack-el_GR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
17,19d8
< openoffice.org-langpack-et_EE-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-eu_ES-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-fi_FI-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
21,24d9
< openoffice.org-langpack-gl_ES-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-he_IL-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-hi_IN-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-hu_HU-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
26,31d10
< openoffice.org-langpack-ja_JP-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-kn_IN-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-ko_KR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-lt_LT-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-ms_MY-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-nb_NO-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
33,36d11
< openoffice.org-langpack-nn_NO-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-pl_PL-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-pt_BR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-pt_PT-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
38,39d12
< openoffice.org-langpack-sk_SK-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-sl_SI-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
41,45d13
< openoffice.org-langpack-th_TH-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-tr_TR-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-zh_CN-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-zh_TW-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-langpack-zu_ZA-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
47,48d14
< openoffice.org-pyuno-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm
< openoffice.org-testtools-1.9.87-1.i386.rpm

The above is from rawhide-20050322

Comment 4 Alexandre Oliva 2005-04-06 05:01:47 UTC

Same problem in today's rawhide, as well as FC4-re0405.0.

Comment 5 Alexandre Oliva 2005-04-24 04:11:51 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154059 ***