Bug 151348 (IT_68821)

Summary: The vte python module fails to import
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Manish Singh <manish.singh>
Component: vteAssignee: Warren Togami <wtogami>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: jturner, mbrad1, tao, van.okamura
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2005-590 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-05 15:38:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 156322    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch lets the module load successfully none

Description Manish Singh 2005-03-17 07:51:37 UTC 
I fixed this upstream, I'd like this to be applied to RHEL4 too, it's needed for
ocfs2console. Silly stray characters in the module file makes it unusable.
Comment 1 Manish Singh 2005-03-17 07:51:38 UTC 
Created attachment 112079 [details]
Patch lets the module load successfully
Comment 2 Van Okamura 2005-03-17 09:11:15 UTC 
Issue tracker 68821
Comment 11 Warren Togami 2005-05-23 02:56:17 UTC 
Oracle, in order to help us judge priority of this change, what part of your
software relies on the vte python module?
Comment 12 Manish Singh 2005-05-23 22:19:30 UTC 
ocfs2console needs it, for the fsck frontend and the node configuration file
propagation bits.

I don't understand why there is so much delay to apply a simple, straightforward
patch that was accepted immediately by the upstream maintainer. Considering that
the python module doesn't work *at all* without this patch, I don't see how
there can be any worries about regressions.
Comment 23 Warren Togami 2005-07-04 02:48:25 UTC 
http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/vte-RHEL4/
Hi Oracle, this is the current candidate package is heading towards RHEL4U2. 
Could you please verify that it solves this issue?  Thanks.
Comment 24 Manish Singh 2005-07-05 20:33:24 UTC 
Yes, the new package solves this problem.
Comment 27 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 15:38:51 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-590.html