Bug 1517637

Summary: improper properties wrapping for long name files
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: lxg <lxg>
Component: pangoAssignee: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 27CC: alexl, caillon+fedoraproject, fonts-bugs, gnome-sig, i18n-bugs, john.j5live, lxg, mclasen, rdieter, rhughes, rstrode, sandmann, tagoh
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: pango-1.40.14-1.fc27 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-07 12:29:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
improper properties wrapping for long name files none

Description lxg 2017-11-27 06:58:04 UTC
Created attachment 1359305 [details]
improper properties wrapping for long name files

Sorry, I do not know the proper component name for this problem!


Description of problem:
I use Fedora 27 with the MATE Desktop Environment 1.19.1. There was a bug of improper wrapping  
long file names and it has been corrected in the last update, i.e.,  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789625
However, the similar problem is still on the "Item Properties".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a file with a very long name  
2. right click the mouse and choose "Properties"
3. we can see the window will be very wide.

Actual results:
The window width will change with respect to the file name length.

Expected results:
Constant properties window size for all files.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2017-11-27 14:13:41 UTC
You linked an upstream pango bug, so pango is probably a better place to land this (though arguably,if it's already acknowledged usptream, there's less need for us to track it here, imo).

Comment 2 lxg 2017-11-30 08:29:19 UTC
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #1)
> You linked an upstream pango bug, so pango is probably a better place to
> land this (though arguably,if it's already acknowledged usptream, there's
> less need for us to track it here, imo).

Dear Dieter, I am sorry that I not familiar with related systems, and please forward this to the proper place. Thanks.

Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2017-11-30 08:44:03 UTC
what's the version of pango do you have?

Comment 4 lxg 2017-12-01 11:15:29 UTC
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #3)
> what's the version of pango do you have?

pango-view (pango) 1.40.13

I am not sure whether it is.

Thanks

Comment 5 Akira TAGOH 2017-12-01 11:31:11 UTC
The issue you referred was fixed in 1.40.14. so please update the package first and try again.

Comment 6 lxg 2017-12-02 08:15:27 UTC
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #5)
> The issue you referred was fixed in 1.40.14. so please update the package
> first and try again.

Thank you!

I will wait the update of Fedora.

Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2017-12-04 05:55:18 UTC
I meant the update has already been published. you have to run "dnf update" to get it on your system.

Comment 8 lxg 2017-12-07 12:16:03 UTC
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #7)
> I meant the update has already been published. you have to run "dnf update"
> to get it on your system.

Thank you!
I have updated and the pango-view version is still 1.40.13. I will wait for the future update.