Bug 1517637 - improper properties wrapping for long name files
Summary: improper properties wrapping for long name files
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: pango
Version: 27
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Akira TAGOH
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-11-27 06:58 UTC by lxg
Modified: 2017-12-07 12:29 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pango-1.40.14-1.fc27
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-07 12:29:51 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
improper properties wrapping for long name files (39.80 KB, image/png)
2017-11-27 06:58 UTC, lxg 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
GNOME Bugzilla 789625 0 None None None 2017-11-27 14:13:41 UTC

Description lxg 2017-11-27 06:58:04 UTC 
Created attachment 1359305 [details]
improper properties wrapping for long name files

Sorry, I do not know the proper component name for this problem!


Description of problem:
I use Fedora 27 with the MATE Desktop Environment 1.19.1. There was a bug of improper wrapping  
long file names and it has been corrected in the last update, i.e.,  https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789625
However, the similar problem is still on the "Item Properties".

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a file with a very long name  
2. right click the mouse and choose "Properties"
3. we can see the window will be very wide.

Actual results:
The window width will change with respect to the file name length.

Expected results:
Constant properties window size for all files.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2017-11-27 14:13:41 UTC 
You linked an upstream pango bug, so pango is probably a better place to land this (though arguably,if it's already acknowledged usptream, there's less need for us to track it here, imo).
Comment 2 lxg 2017-11-30 08:29:19 UTC 
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #1)
> You linked an upstream pango bug, so pango is probably a better place to
> land this (though arguably,if it's already acknowledged usptream, there's
> less need for us to track it here, imo).

Dear Dieter, I am sorry that I not familiar with related systems, and please forward this to the proper place. Thanks.
Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2017-11-30 08:44:03 UTC 
what's the version of pango do you have?
Comment 4 lxg 2017-12-01 11:15:29 UTC 
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #3)
> what's the version of pango do you have?

pango-view (pango) 1.40.13

I am not sure whether it is.

Thanks
Comment 5 Akira TAGOH 2017-12-01 11:31:11 UTC 
The issue you referred was fixed in 1.40.14. so please update the package first and try again.
Comment 6 lxg 2017-12-02 08:15:27 UTC 
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #5)
> The issue you referred was fixed in 1.40.14. so please update the package
> first and try again.

Thank you!

I will wait the update of Fedora.
Comment 7 Akira TAGOH 2017-12-04 05:55:18 UTC 
I meant the update has already been published. you have to run "dnf update" to get it on your system.
Comment 8 lxg 2017-12-07 12:16:03 UTC 
(In reply to Akira TAGOH from comment #7)
> I meant the update has already been published. you have to run "dnf update"
> to get it on your system.

Thank you!
I have updated and the pango-view version is still 1.40.13. I will wait for the future update.
Comment 9 Akira TAGOH 2017-12-07 12:29:51 UTC 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c60db60c3e
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.