Bug 1531670

Summary: Review Request: rust-error-chain - Error boilerplate library
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: lemenkov, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: lemenkov: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-06 19:10:54 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Igor Gnatenko 2018-01-05 18:41:06 UTC
Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-error-chain.spec
SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust/rust-error-chain-0.11.0-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: Error boilerplate library.
FAS account: ignatenkobrain

Comment 1 Igor Gnatenko 2018-01-06 08:37:49 UTC
*** Bug 1531857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2018-01-06 11:14:03 UTC
I'll review it.

Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2018-01-06 11:24:25 UTC
REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

The package is mostly autogenerated, so everything is built according to the Guidelines.

+ The package is named according to the  Package Naming Guidelines.
+ The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec.
+ The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
+ The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines.
+ The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (MIT or Apache 2.0).
+ The files, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, are included as %license.
+ The spec file is written in American English.
+ The spec file for the package is legible.
+ The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture.
+ All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
0 No need to handle locales.
0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
+ The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
0 The package is not designed to be relocatable.
+ The package owns all directories that it creates.
+ The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings.
+ Permissions on files are set properly.
+ The package consistently uses macros.
+ The package contains code, or permissible content.
0 No extremely large documentation files.
+ Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application.
0 No C/C++ header files.
0 No static libraries.
0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files.
0 The package doesn't contain library files without a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so) in some of the dynamic linker's default paths.
+ The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives.
0 Not a GUI application.
+ The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
+ All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

APPROVED.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2018-01-06 16:48:06 UTC
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-error-chain