Bug 154620
Summary: | kernel has problems with dual core processor boards | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Jaegermann <michal> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Dave Jones <davej> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | CC: | barryn, jparadis, pfrields, thomas.duffy.99 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-07-15 20:53:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Attachments: |
Description
Michal Jaegermann
2005-04-13 03:02:20 UTC
Created attachment 113077 [details]
dmesg log from booting with 'noapic'
Created attachment 113078 [details]
An output from dmidecode on the test machine
Created attachment 113079 [details]
resuts of 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' is a machne sort of booted
Dual-core support is pretty new upstream, so this isn't going to work properly until FC3 gets a 2.6.12 kernel, or that support gets backported to a .11 update. Michal, if you boot with "numa=off", does the system work? (or am I mixing up my workarounds?) > Michal, if you boot with "numa=off", does the system work?
Of the top of my head - no; but the system is now some 25 kilometers away
and I may misremember various possibilities which I tried.
I should be around the box tommorow and then I can recheck.
As for 2.6.12 - from what I have seen in sources 2.6.11-1.1236_FC4 seems
to be 2.6.12-rc2 plus other patches so I hoped that at least this one
will behave. :-(
there's some fixes pending in the x86-64 tree that aren't merged in Linus tree yet. Due to the current situation with him not merging patches, this is in limbo for the timebeing. In a response to comment #5 - booting with 'numa=off' does not seem to make much of a difference. With a dual core CPU leaving 'noapic' makes the machine to lock up right away. If 'noapic' is used a presence of 'numa=off' is inconsequential AFAICT. If using single core CPUs it is possible to boot without any extra options but then a networking is dead and only 'noapic' seems to help with this. OTOH the whole mobo does not look very healthy as even with single core CPUs the second one is still missing although there are no visible oopses during bootup. Possbily because we are not trying to initialize the second CPU at all and the later appears to a trouble either in a hardware or in BIOS. The fix for this went into 2.6.12-rc3. I have verified that a 2.6.12-rc3 tree will boot on dual-core x86_64. Created attachment 113690 [details]
oops caused by rpc.nfsd for 2.6.11-1.1267_FC4smp kernel
Indeed both 2.6.12-rc3 and 2.6.11-1.1267_FC4.x86_64, which is based
on that kernel, will boot on a dual core Opteron board; at least on
this sample I could try. All CPUs show up in /proc/cpuinfo as
expected. The catch is that one needs nash from mkinitrd-4.2.8-1
or mounts on initrd fail. For corresponding UP kernels nash from
mkinitrd-4.1.18-2 (FC3) is good enough.
Still booting 2.6.11-1.1267_FC4.x86_64 I got an attached oops.
A machine is still operational after that but this happens consistently
on every "Starting NFS daemon:" and rpc.nfsd does not run. A version
of nfs-utils does not seem to be relevant here.
Smells like oops from comment #10 is related to bug #1559 Ouch, lets try again: Smells like oops from comment #10 is related to bug #155999 that'll be fixed in tomorrows build. An update has been released for Fedora Core 3 (kernel-2.6.12-1.1372_FC3) which may contain a fix for your problem. Please update to this new kernel, and report whether or not it fixes your problem. If you have updated to Fedora Core 4 since this bug was opened, and the problem still occurs with the latest updates for that release, please change the version field of this bug to 'fc4'. Thank you. If nobody else is seeing the problem I think that this is resolved in the current kernels. If will hear no protests I will close that bug. |