Bug 1547043

Summary: Research for Active Standby HA solutions for Amphora
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Nir Magnezi <nmagnezi>
Component: openstack-octaviaAssignee: Carlos Goncalves <cgoncalves>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Bruna Bonguardo <bbonguar>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 14.0 (Rocky)CC: amuller, astupnik, bbonguar, bcafarel, bshephar, cgoncalves, fiezzi, ihrachys, lpeer, majopela, mori, sputhenp, tfreger
Target Milestone: Upstream M2Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-09-30 10:06:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1577976, 1655431    
Bug Blocks: 1547447, 1698576    

Description Nir Magnezi 2018-02-20 12:09:08 UTC 
Research current (Active-Standby) and future (Active-Active) HA solutions for Amphora.

Active Standby:
===============
Upstream documentation: https://docs.openstack.org/octavia/ocata/specs/version0.8/active_passive_loadbalancer.html
Relevant code bits: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/activepassiveamphora


Active Active:
==============
Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/octavia/+spec/l3-active-active
Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234639
Relevant code bits:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313006/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499807/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/491016/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529191/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537842/

Some more bits might possibly be here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/active-active+project:openstack/octavia+status:open
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/bp+l3-active-active
Comment 6 Nir Magnezi 2018-06-11 08:58:50 UTC 
As a follow up to a discussion we had, in OSP14 we are going to focus on the usability and stability of the Active Standby topology. Thus, Active-Active amphorae (which currently has no been merged upstream) will no be covered by this RFE.
Comment 11 Carlos Goncalves 2019-09-30 10:06:46 UTC 
The purpose of this RHBZ was to conduct research on active-standby amphora support. The study has concluded and support was implemented upstream. For this reason, I am closing as CURRENTRELEASE.

For official support in OSP, please refer to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698576.