Bug 1556048

Summary:	libkolab: FTBFS in F28
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component:	libkolab	Assignee:	Timotheus Pokorra <pokorra.mailinglists>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	28	CC:	awilliam, jplesnik, pokorra.mailinglists, rdieter, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-04-04 15:26:15 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1555378

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2018-03-14 23:07:40 UTC

Your package libkolab failed to build from source in current F28.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24812456

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2018-04-03 23:38:07 UTC

It fails because it's looking for what looks like a kdelibs4 header:

In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/libkolab-1.0.2/kolabformat/v2helpers.h:23,
                 from /builddir/build/BUILD/libkolab-1.0.2/kolabformat/kolabobject.cpp:20:
/builddir/build/BUILD/libkolab-1.0.2/./kolabformatV2/kolabbase.h:40:10: fatal error: kdatetime.h: No such file or directory
 #include <kdatetime.h>
          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~

I tried just adding a BR for kf5-kdelibs4support-devel , but that doesn't help (as it doesn't include the right dir on the include path). Before going any further in trying to fix this, should the package just be retired for F28+ ? It doesn't seem to be needed: the only thing that depends on anything provided by libkolab is python2-kolab, and nothing requires anything that python2-kolab provides. AFAICS.

Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2018-04-04 15:23:34 UTC

That's a deprecated (and recently removed) api from kf5-kcalendarcore I believe

Comment 3 Rex Dieter 2018-04-04 15:24:32 UTC

My recommendation is to retire this, at least until it's fixed and/or anything else really needs it.

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2018-04-04 15:26:15 UTC

See also further correspondence in bug #1518800 (marking as dup, since there's more info there)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1518800 ***