Bug 1560497

Summary: regression should trigger when we change behaviour of product
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Sanju <srakonde>
Component: project-infrastructureAssignee: bugs <bugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: mainlineCC: atumball, bugs, gluster-infra, nigelb
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-03-26 13:48:50 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sanju 2018-03-26 10:43:14 UTC
Description of problem:
Currently regression is skipping the tests for changes in some ignored files and saying regression is success. Some of these files can change the behaviour of the product and some test cases might be written considering the old values in those files. So regression needs to trigger the test cases for changes in the files which can change the behaviour of the product.

Here, is a similar case: 

This patch (https://review.gluster.org/#/c/19744/) changed the network.inode-lru-limit value from 50000 to 200000. Regression is success saying "Skipped tests for change that only modifies ignored files". This caused tests/basic/md-cache/bug-1418249.t test to fail in master because it was expecting the old value.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Nigel Babu 2018-03-26 11:58:55 UTC
This is handled by the .testignore file in the root of the repo. You can send a patch to remove those two files from .testignore in the root of the repo.

Comment 2 Amar Tumballi 2018-03-26 13:46:04 UTC
Sorry, used another bug id for this: https://review.gluster.org/19775  fixes the issue now

Comment 3 Nigel Babu 2018-03-26 13:48:50 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1560393 ***