Bug 1562061

Summary:	Fail with "unresolved deps" in repolcosure of f28 Beta 1.3
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Menanteau Guy <menantea>
Component:	redhat-rpm-config	Assignee:	Florian Festi <ffesti>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	28	CC:	ajax, dan, ffesti, fweimer, ignatenko, john.j5live, jonathan, menantea, pmatilai, praiskup
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	ppc64le
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-03-29 13:12:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1071880

Description Menanteau Guy 2018-03-29 12:57:55 UTC

I tried test https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure
for Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-28_Beta-1.3.iso

for powerpc, I used old method with repoclosure command

mount -o loop Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-28_Beta-1.3.iso /media
dnf install yum-utils
repoclosure -a ppc64le --repofrompath myrepo,/media/ --newest -t -r myrepo

...
package: redhat-rpm-config-106-1.fc28.noarch from myrepo
  unresolved deps: 
     (annobin if gcc)

expected result:
none "unresolved deps" should be reported.

This problem is present on ppc64 and ppc64le

Comment 1 Florian Weimer 2018-03-29 12:59:33 UTC

What's your repoclosure version?  Where did you get it?

Comment 2 Dan Horák 2018-03-29 13:01:44 UTC

clearly repoclosure (from yum-utils) doesn't understand the weak/rich rpm deps

Comment 3 Menanteau Guy 2018-03-29 13:12:27 UTC

ok, it seems that this test should be done with rpmdeplint but rpmdeplint does not support powerpc...

rpmdeplint check-repoclosure --repo testdeps,/media /media/Packages/s/systemd* 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rpmdeplint/__init__.py", line 42, in get_hawkey_package_arch
    return arch_map[pkg_arch]
KeyError: 'ppc64le'

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/rpmdeplint", line 11, in <module>
    load_entry_point('rpmdeplint==1.4', 'console_scripts', 'rpmdeplint')()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rpmdeplint/cli.py", line 232, in main
    return args.func(args)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rpmdeplint/cli.py", line 73, in cmd_check_repoclosure
    with dependency_analyzer_from_args(args) as analyzer:
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rpmdeplint/cli.py", line 145, in dependency_analyzer_from_args
    sack_arches = {get_hawkey_package_arch(rpm) for rpm in rpms} - {'noarch'}
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rpmdeplint/cli.py", line 145, in <setcomp>
    sack_arches = {get_hawkey_package_arch(rpm) for rpm in rpms} - {'noarch'}
  File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rpmdeplint/__init__.py", line 46, in get_hawkey_package_arch
    package_name, pkg_arch))
AttributeError: Architecture was not correctly determined for /media/Packages/s/systemd-238-7.fc28.ppc64le.rpm arch was ppc64le

I close this bug