Bug 156745

Summary: Problems Compiling php-4.3.11-2.5.src.rpm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Eli Wapniarski <eli>
Component: phpAssignee: Joe Orton <jorton>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i686   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-03 21:02:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eli Wapniarski 2005-05-03 20:48:34 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.4; Linux) KHTML/3.4.0 (like Gecko)

Description of problem:
I tried to compile  php-4.3.11-2.5.src.rpm. I have installed compenants of  
net-snmp net-snmp-5.2.1-10.FC3. I have modified the SRPM so that I get all  
modules as shared compenants and seperate RPMS. I have been successfully  
doing this for two years.  
  
I received two errors during the testing phase which were fixed by the following  
modifications to the SPEC as indicated below. I do not believe that the solution is  
satisfactory as will be indicated by the out that is provided later.  
  
# Tests that fail as of 4.3.11  
rm -f ext/standard/tests/array/bug31213.phpt \  
      ext/standard/tests/array/locale_sort.phpt \  
      ext/standard/tests/file/bug26938.phpt \  
      ext/standard/tests/file/proc_open01.phpt  
  
I first received the error concerning bug26938, applied the change as indicated  
above. Tried compiling again and received the second error concerning  
proc_open01. At which poing I added the modification as indicated.  
  
The output of the twp error messages during testing part of the compilation 
follows.  
  
===================================================================== 
FAILED TEST SUMMARY 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Bug #26938 (exec does not read consecutive long lines correctly) [ext/standard/t 
ests/file/bug26938.phpt] 
proc_open() regression test 1 (proc_open() leak) [ext/standard/tests/file/proc_o 
pen01.phpt] 
===================================================================== 
make: *** [test] Error 1 
+ set +x 
TEST FAILURE: ../ext/standard/tests/file/bug26938.diff -- 
001- md5(line 0)= e86410fa2d6e2634fd8ac5f4b3afe7f3 (length 10) 
001+ PHP Warning:  Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library 
'/usr/lib/php4/snmp 
.so' - /usr/lib/php4/snmp.so: undefined symbol: usmAES192PrivProtocol in 
Unknown 
 on line 0 
002- md5(line 1)= e84debf3a1d132871d7fe45c1c04c566 (length 20000) 
002+ md5(line 0)= e86410fa2d6e2634fd8ac5f4b3afe7f3 (length 10) 
003- md5(line 2)= c33b4d2f86908eea5d75ee5a61fd81f4 (length 10000) 
003+ md5(line 1)= e84debf3a1d132871d7fe45c1c04c566 (length 20000) 
004- md5(line 3)= 2ecdde3959051d913f61b14579ea136d (length 5) 
004+ md5(line 2)= c33b4d2f86908eea5d75ee5a61fd81f4 (length 10000) 
005- md5(line 4)= c33b4d2f86908eea5d75ee5a61fd81f4 (length 10000) 
005+ md5(line 3)= 2ecdde3959051d913f61b14579ea136d (length 5) 
006- md5(line 5)= 902fbdd2b1df0c4f70b4a5d23525e932 (length 3) 
006+ md5(line 4)= c33b4d2f86908eea5d75ee5a61fd81f4 (length 10000) 
007+ md5(line 5)= 902fbdd2b1df0c4f70b4a5d23525e932 (length 3) 
-- ../ext/standard/tests/file/bug26938.diff result ends. 
TEST FAILURE: ../ext/standard/tests/file/proc_open01.diff -- 
003-   resource(%d) of type (stream) 
003+   resource(4) of type (stream) 
005-   resource(%d) of type (stream) 
005+   resource(5) of type (stream) 
007- string(5) "yay! 
007+ PHP Warning:  Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library 
'/usr/lib/php4/snmp 
.so' - /usr/lib/php4/snmp.so: undefined symbol: usmAES192PrivProtocol in 
Unknown 
 on line 0 
008- " 
008+ string(5) "yay! 
009- array(3) { 
009+ " 
010-   [0]=> 
010+ array(3) { 
011-   int(1) 
011+   [0]=> 
012-   [1]=> 
012+   int(1) 
013-   int(2) 
013+   [1]=> 
014-   [2]=> 
014+   int(2) 
015-   int(3) 
015+   [2]=> 
016- } 
016+   int(3) 
017+ } 
-- ../ext/standard/tests/file/proc_open01.diff result ends. 
 
**************************************************************** 
**************************************************************** 
 
===================================================================== 
FAILED TEST SUMMARY 
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
proc_open() regression test 1 (proc_open() leak) 
[ext/standard/tests/file/proc_open01.phpt] 
===================================================================== 
make: *** [test] Error 1 
+ set +x 
TEST FAILURE: ../ext/standard/tests/file/proc_open01.diff -- 
003-   resource(%d) of type (stream) 
003+   resource(4) of type (stream) 
005-   resource(%d) of type (stream) 
005+   resource(5) of type (stream) 
007- string(5) "yay! 
007+ PHP Warning:  Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library 
'/usr/lib/php4/snmp.so' - /usr/lib/php4/snmp.so: undefined symbol: 
usmAES192PrivProtocol in Unknown on line 0 
008- " 
008+ string(5) "yay! 
009- array(3) { 
009+ " 
010-   [0]=> 
010+ array(3) { 
011-   int(1) 
011+   [0]=> 
012-   [1]=> 
012+   int(1) 
013-   int(2) 
013+   [1]=> 
014-   [2]=> 
014+   int(2) 
015-   int(3) 
015+   [2]=> 
016- } 
016+   int(3) 
017+ } 
-- ../ext/standard/tests/file/proc_open01.diff result ends. 
 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
php-4.3.11-2.5

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  

Additional info:

Comment 1 Joe Orton 2005-05-03 21:02:34 UTC
The failures are because you have the incompatible net-snmp/php combination
installed:

001+ PHP Warning:  Unknown(): Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php4/snmp
.so' - /usr/lib/php4/snmp.so: undefined symbol: usmAES192PrivProtocol in

if you remove php-snmp first, it should work.  The Raw Hide php shouldn't suffer
from this problem, also.

Comment 2 Joe Orton 2005-05-03 22:09:08 UTC
*** Bug 156746 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Eli Wapniarski 2005-05-04 03:18:17 UTC
Oh... OK... so what you're saying is that there is no problem. And, that the failed tests, if 
removed, does not indicate a potential failure of the module per se.