Bug 157590

Summary:	[RFE] please keep clamav up-to-date
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	shrek-m <shrek-m>
Component:	clamav	Assignee:	Enrico Scholz <rh-bugzilla>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://clamav.net/stable.php#pagestart
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-05-16 19:34:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description shrek-m 2005-05-12 22:18:19 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050417 Fedora/1.7.7-1.3.1

Description of problem:
http://clamav.net/stable.php#pagestart
clamav 0.85 released (Wed, 11 May 2005 18:28:59 GMT)

FC3-extras has 0.71-2

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.83-2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
clamav is outdated

Additional info:

Comment 1 shrek-m 2005-05-12 22:29:53 UTC

i can not understand why you are splitting clamav in such a lot of packages.
why not only eg.
clamav (including freshclam, clamd, etc)
and clamav-milter

$ yum -d0 list clamav*
Installed Packages
clamav.ppc                               0.83-2                 installed
clamav-data.ppc                          0.83-2                 installed
clamav-devel.ppc                         0.83-2                 installed
clamav-lib.ppc                           0.83-2                 installed
clamav-milter.ppc                        0.83-2                 installed
clamav-server.ppc                        0.83-2                 installed
clamav-update.ppc                        0.83-2                 installed

Comment 2 Warren Togami 2005-05-14 08:48:45 UTC

Enrico mind if I checkin 0.85 to FC4 Extras?  Since it is still rawhide-like
risk is minimal.

What do I do about that CVS comment stuff at the top of your spec?

I'm testing the RPM rebuilt with 0.85 sources on FC2.  Other people should test
it on other dists.  If all signs are positive we can push it on FC1-FC4 Extras.

Comment 3 Enrico Scholz 2005-05-14 09:02:20 UTC

at comment #1:
--------------

please read http://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=268#c13; most of the
questions about clamav packaging are already answered in fedora.us bugzilla ;)

at comment #2:
--------------

just requested build of 0.85 for testing

What do you mean with 'CVS comment stuff'?

Comment 4 Warren Togami 2005-05-14 09:04:32 UTC

fedora.us pending repository FC1 and FC2 have 0.85 binaries now.  Please test
those if you are running those distributions.

Comment 5 shrek-m 2005-05-16 19:34:36 UTC

thanks, 0.85 is in extras/development.

i never heard before
  fedora-usermgmt
  fedora-usermgmt-setup
  fedora-usermgmt-shadow
which are installed for dependencies.
in the last few years all packages were satsified with shadow-utils.

`yum remove fedora-usermgmt*`  did the trick.
oops, clamav* was removed too ;-)

sorry enrico, i guess your packages are not for me.
imho something is going wrong here.

Comment 6 Warren Togami 2005-05-16 19:37:02 UTC

Not "wrong", but "different".  fedora-usermgmt is an alternative way of handling
system users.  The way used by other packages is fragile and wrong.