Bug 1576930
| Summary: | mate-panel high memory usage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Prarit Bhargava <prarit> |
| Component: | mate-panel | Assignee: | Wolfgang Ulbrich <raveit65.sun> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 27 | CC: | jszinger, prarit, raveit65.sun, stefano |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | mate-panel-1.20.1-6.fc27 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-05-28 16:26:08 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Prarit Bhargava
2018-05-10 18:51:49 UTC
Do you use windows-applets via wine in na-tray? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575091 Can you please test if this build fixes the issue? Follow links to you arch and download needed rpms. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26851768 (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #1) > Do you use windows-applets via wine in na-tray? > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575091 Nope, not using wine. BUT ... I'm using tigervnc! That's an interesting commonality between the two bugs. P. (In reply to Wolfgang Ulbrich from comment #2) > Can you please test if this build fixes the issue? > Follow links to you arch and download needed rpms. > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26851768 I will install it now. It takes about 4 days to reproduce the bug, so I will respond back next week. P. The build in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576930#c2 works AFAICT. mate-panel has very low memory usage: 2196 prarit 20 0 749068 73236 22052 S 0.0 0.3 0:14.88 mate-panel P. mate-panel-1.20.1-6.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7cbfe6ab39 mate-panel-1.20.1-6.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7cbfe6ab39 mate-panel-1.20.1-6.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. This seems to have reappeared in mate-panel-1.20.3-1.fc28.x86_64. Please re-open. Please provide additional information? na-tray-applet isn't build in-process. So this is another issue. mate-panel is currently consuming 1GB of memory: $ ps v -C mate-panel PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND 2931 pts/9 Sl 17:02 13 587 1889564 1083460 3.2 mate-panel --replace After restarting mate-panel, memory use drop to a more sane 42 MB: $ ps v -C mate-panel PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND 2182 pts/9 Sl 0:01 6 587 840756 42360 0.1 mate-panel --replace The changelog says: $ rpm -q --changelog mate-panel|less * Wed Aug 08 2018 Wolfgang Ulbrich <fedora> - 1.20.3-1 - update to 1.20.3 release - build wnck and clock applet with-in-process, fix rhbz (#1590569) - fix ld scriptlets in spec file * Fri Jun 01 2018 Wolfgang Ulbrich <fedora> - 1.20.2-1 - update to 1.20.2 * Sun May 20 2018 Wolfgang Ulbrich <fedora> - 1.20.1-7 - switch back to build applets out of process [snip] * Tue Feb 13 2018 Wolfgang Ulbrich <chat-to-me> - 1.20.0-2 - build applets as in-process for better HDPI support - drop IconCache rpm scriplet I was experiencing the memory leak from 1.20.0-2 until it was fixed in 1.20.1-7. It has now returned. It could be a separate bug, but the symptoms appear the same for me, so I decided to comment on this bug. |