Bug 1580322
Summary: | [RFE] Include rhn-virtualization-host package into RHV-H optional channel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Roman Bobek <rbobek> |
Component: | rhev-hypervisor-ng | Assignee: | Nir Levy <nlevy> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | cshao <cshao> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.2.3 | CC: | bmidwood, bugs, cshao, dfediuck, huzhao, ktordeur, mtessun, qiyuan, rbobek, weiwang, yaniwang, ycui |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | Flags: | rbobek:
needinfo-
|
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-01-15 09:28:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Node | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1653669 |
Description
Roman Bobek
2018-05-21 09:23:42 UTC
QE will check whether RHVH include rhn-virtualization-host package by default. Hi Roman, as we want to keep the footprint of the RHV-H Image as small as possible, it does not look like a good idea adding rhn-virtualization-host to this. Reasons: In case the system is managed by satellite, the package can be installed from satellite directly after the installation. Satellite 5.8 is the old product, so there is no long term need for adding this package anyways. So is there a business or technical justification that the customer can't do the following instead: - Create his own ISO with rhn-virtualization-host included - Install the package from Satellite once the RHV-H is deployed The latter could be easily achieved by an ansible script as well, including the registration to the Satellite. Thanks! Martin Any update? Due to lack of feedback, we are closing this issue, in case of re-emerge of interest, please open a new bug. |