Bug 158485

Summary:	openoffice.org clashes with missing libjawt.so.6
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Warren Togami <wtogami>
Component:	openoffice.org	Assignee:	Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	astokes, dcbw, fitzsim, hmj, jakub, jkeating, lmacken, overholt, peterennis, redhat
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-05-29 06:11:39 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	136450

Description Warren Togami 2005-05-22 21:35:21 UTC

Description of problem:
openoffice.org-core-1.9.104-1 is incompatible with the latest gcc-4.0.0-8 stack
in dist-fc4, causing a dependency clash and upgrade failure.  This is a FC4Blocker.

What changed and why?

Comment 1 Dan Williams 2005-05-22 23:33:49 UTC

Umm, gcc-4.0.0-8 changed the AWT library from libjawt.so -> libgcjawt.so because
proprietary VMs use libjawt and gcj shouldn't clash with them.  While
libgcjawt.so supposedly gets symlinked to libjawt.so, OOo currently relies upon
"-ljawt".

So, OOo uses a JAVA_HOME variable to point to the base of the JDK.  Well, for
GCJ that's "/usr" because that's where bin/java and bin/javac are rooted from. 
However, that's _not_ where the rest of the java libraries are...  We should
probably be pointing at "/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.4.2-gcj-1.4.2.0" now, but that may
clash with assumptions scattered around the code that were made before the
java-gcj-compat packages were developed.

I'm trying a build pointed to the new location, we'll see how it goes.

Comment 2 Bojan Smojver 2005-05-23 01:55:04 UTC

This should be marked as duplicate of bug #158411.

And yes, I'm seeing it too :-(

Comment 3 Warren Togami 2005-05-23 02:02:39 UTC

*** Bug 158411 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Dan Williams 2005-05-23 20:46:39 UTC

A fix for the gcjawt library is in CVS, and a new copy of OOo is building now to
fix some utter berkeleydb stupidity (which was blocking the rebuild this weekend).

Comment 5 Jeremy Katz 2005-05-23 23:22:56 UTC

Package is building now.

Comment 6 Dan Williams 2005-05-24 13:40:21 UTC

*** Bug 158613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2005-05-24 14:34:37 UTC

In response to Comment #1:

On the compile line that specifies -ljawt, add (or modify the existing -L to be):

-L%{_jvmdir}/java/jre/lib/%{_arch}

Comment 8 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2005-05-24 20:02:31 UTC

Actually, this should be: -L%{_jvmdir}/jre/lib/%{_arch}, since only
java-1.4.2-gcj-compat may be installed (and not java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-devel).

But looking at the spec file, you've linked directly to libgcjawt.so, which is
fine too.

Comment 9 Warren Togami 2005-05-24 20:40:46 UTC

http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/openoffice/
I copied binaries here for i386 for testing.